Accessible laparoscopic liver resection performed in low volume centers: Is it time for democratization?

• Published in: Journal of visceral surgery Vol. 157; no. 3; pp. 193 - 197
• Main Authors: Bouras, A.F., Liddo, G., Marx-Deseure, A., Leroy, A., Decanter, G.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Masson SAS 01.06.2020
• Subjects: Laparoscopy; Liver resection; Low volume centres; Short-term outcomes; Laparoscopy; Liver resection; Low volume centres; Short-term outcomes
• ISSN: 1878-7886; 1878-7886
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2019.10.003

Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been developed and is daily practiced by many expert teams. However, very few data are available on the experience of low volume centres. The aim of our study was to report and discuss the operative results of LLR performed in three low volume centres. Records of patients who underwent a LLR in three low volume centres in France between May 2014 and November 2017 were collected. Endpoints studied were indications, intra and postoperative outcomes as well as short-term outcomes. A total of 46 patients (57 specimen resected) underwent a LLR during this period, representing 29.6% of total liver resections. Indications of LLR were benign lesions in 26%, primitive malignant lesions in 32.6% and metastatic tumours in 41.3%. Median size of lesions was 22mm (range 11–100). Most liver resections were non-anatomic (64.7%), while left lateral sectionectomies represented 19.2%. Five patients required conversion and there were at the end 3 specimen with margins inferior to 1mm resected laparoscopically. Postoperative mortality was nil and morbidity rate was 17.3%. Median hospital stay was 6 days (3–15). Although LLR have gained acceptance in surgeons’ arsenal, it remains concentrated in referral centres. Our results suggest the feasibility of LLR in non-academic centres when it comes to small accessible lesions. Further studies would provide data about the long-term safety of this procedure in those centres.