"Female aggression" revisited: Variable- and person-centered approaches to studying gender differences in different types of aggression

We looked for evidence supporting the hypothesis that girls are more indirectly aggressive than boys by 1) comparing the average scores of girls and boys on the Direct Indirect Aggression Scales [Björkqvist et al., 1992b], and 2) by comparing the distributions of boys and girls in five cluster group...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAggressive behavior Vol. 30; no. 2; pp. 158 - 163
Main Authors Salmivalli, Christina, Kaukiainen, Ari
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.03.2004
Wiley-Liss
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We looked for evidence supporting the hypothesis that girls are more indirectly aggressive than boys by 1) comparing the average scores of girls and boys on the Direct Indirect Aggression Scales [Björkqvist et al., 1992b], and 2) by comparing the distributions of boys and girls in five cluster groups representing different ‘aggression profiles’, or combinations of values in physical, verbal, and indirect aggression. The subjects were 526 children in three separate age groups: 10, 12, and 14 years. While boys were, on average, both directly and indirectly more aggressive than girls, the cluster analysis revealed a group of highly aggressive adolescents whose use of aggression was predominantly indirect. The members of this cluster group (n=36) were all girls. Aggr. Behav. 30:158–163, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-N62VWKZD-6
istex:7F3418265E78E3D3001A551CEB06B20941A06E30
ArticleID:AB20012
ISSN:0096-140X
1098-2337
DOI:10.1002/ab.20012