Oral Proficiency Standards and Foreign Language Teacher Candidates: Current Findings and Future Research Directions

The renewed national focus on teacher quality and effectiveness has resulted in more rigorous standards that describe the knowledge and skills required of teacher candidates across all disciplines. In the area of foreign languages, three sets of professional standards address the oral proficiency of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inForeign language annals Vol. 46; no. 2; pp. 264 - 289
Main Authors Glisan, Eileen W., Swender, Elvira, Surface, Eric A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Alexandria Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.06.2013
Wiley-Blackwell
American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The renewed national focus on teacher quality and effectiveness has resulted in more rigorous standards that describe the knowledge and skills required of teacher candidates across all disciplines. In the area of foreign languages, three sets of professional standards address the oral proficiency of teachers in the target languages they teach across the career continuum. For teacher candidates, the ACTFL/NCATE Program Standards for the Preparation of Foreign Language Teachers (2002) establish minimum oral proficiency levels based on the ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines—Speaking (2012). Utilizing ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview (OPI) data, this study examines to what extent candidates are attaining the ACTFL/NCATE Oral Proficiency Standard of Advanced Low in most languages or Intermediate High in Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, and Korean. Findings indicate that 54.8% of candidates attained the required standard between 2006 and 2012 and that significant differences emerged for language, year tested, and university program results. Further research that takes into account additional contextual information about candidates and programs will inform continuing professional dialogue about the oral proficiency of teacher candidates entering the profession.
Bibliography:istex:3BEFADF274C50CBF1E1F807B9CF015E98C40EABB
ark:/67375/WNG-6VP202R9-Q
ArticleID:FLAN12030
ISSN:0015-718X
1944-9720
DOI:10.1111/flan.12030