Why different people prefer different systems for different tasks: An activity perspective on technology adoption in a dynamic user environment
In a contemporary user environment, there are often multiple information systems available for a certain type of task. Based on the premises of Activity Theory, this study examines how user characteristics, system experiences, and task situations influence an individual's preferences among diff...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Vol. 63; no. 1; pp. 48 - 63 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
01.01.2012
Wiley Wiley Periodicals Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | In a contemporary user environment, there are often multiple information systems available for a certain type of task. Based on the premises of Activity Theory, this study examines how user characteristics, system experiences, and task situations influence an individual's preferences among different systems in terms of user readiness to interact with each. It hypothesizes that system experiences directly shape specific user readiness at the within‐subject level, user characteristics and task situations make differences in general user readiness at the between‐subject level, and task situations also affect specific user readiness through the mediation of system experiences. An empirical study was conducted, and the results supported the hypothesized relationships. The findings provide insights on how to enhance technology adoption by tailoring system development and management to various task contexts and different user groups. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:5F0F24F070318306BC7EB48E7F24C8253FA7541F ark:/67375/WNG-2ST929NX-W ArticleID:ASI21670 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1532-2882 2330-1635 1532-2890 2330-1643 |
DOI: | 10.1002/asi.21670 |