Gemcitabine and glioblastoma: challenges and current perspectives

•New drugs are required to treat glioblastoma and limit resistance.•Gemcitabine displays specific advantages over temozolomide.•Gemcitabine immunomodulating capacity could be useful to cure glioblastoma.•Gemcitabine administered concurrently with radiotherapy is safe in humans.•Alternative drug deli...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDrug discovery today Vol. 23; no. 2; pp. 416 - 423
Main Authors Bastiancich, Chiara, Bastiat, Guillaume, Lagarce, Frederic
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.02.2018
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•New drugs are required to treat glioblastoma and limit resistance.•Gemcitabine displays specific advantages over temozolomide.•Gemcitabine immunomodulating capacity could be useful to cure glioblastoma.•Gemcitabine administered concurrently with radiotherapy is safe in humans.•Alternative drug delivery strategies are proposed to enhance gemcitabine efficiency. Gemcitabine is a nucleoside analog currently used for the treatment of various solid tumors as a single agent or in combination with other chemotherapeutic drugs. Its use against highly aggressive brain tumors (glioblastoma) has been evaluated in preclinical and clinical trials leading to controversial results. Gemcitabine can inhibit DNA chain elongation, is a potent radiosensitizer and it can enhance antitumor immune activity, but it also presents some drawbacks (e.g., short half-life, side effects, chemoresistance). The aim of this review is to discuss the challenges related to the use of gemcitabine for glioblastoma and to report recent studies that suggest overcoming these obstacles opening new perspectives for its use in the field (e.g., gemcitabine derivatives and/or nanomedicines).
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1359-6446
1741-8364
1878-5832
DOI:10.1016/j.drudis.2017.10.010