On the role of hot towers in tropical cyclone formation

The probabilistic approach to tropical cyclogenesis is advanced here by examining the role of convection in the early stages. The development of ``hot towers'', that is tall cumulonimbus towers which reach or penetrate the tropopause, and their role in tropical cyclogenesis is investigated...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMeteorology and atmospheric physics Vol. 67; no. 1-4; pp. 15 - 35
Main Authors SIMPSON, J, HALVERSON, J. B, FERRIER, B. S, PETERSEN, W. A, SIMPSON, R. H, BLAKESLEE, R, DURDEN, S. L
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Wien Springer 01.01.1998
New York, NY
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The probabilistic approach to tropical cyclogenesis is advanced here by examining the role of convection in the early stages. The development of ``hot towers'', that is tall cumulonimbus towers which reach or penetrate the tropopause, and their role in tropical cyclogenesis is investigated in two well-documented cases of formation, namely hurricane Daisy (1995) in the Atlantic and Tropical Cyclone Oliver (1993) in the Coral Sea. The hot towers in Daisy had been intensively studied by Malkus and Riehl three decades ago but remained mainly unpublished. The dynamics of Oliver genesis by merging mesoscale vortices has been recently reported, but much of the aircraft data remained. This paper adds the evolving contribution of cumulus-scale events and their associated electrification, which was made possible by the addition of an electric field mill, a numerical cloud model and other remote sensors. In their genesis stages, Daisy and Oliver appeared very different because Daisy resulted from a deepening tropical wave in the Atlantic and the pre-Oliver vortex emerged eastward from the Australian monsoon trough. However, the vertical profiles of theta sub(E) in the rain areas were nearly identical, with the characteristic concave shape showing substantial midlevel minima. Therefore, both required increasing upflux of high theta sub(E) subcloud air in order to accomplish the formation stage, with about two hot towers each in the nascent eyewall. In both cases, partial eyewalls developed at the edge of the convection, permitting subsidence in the forming eye, which was shown to contribute to the pressure fall. The probabilistic concept proposes that any contribution to early pressure fall raises the probability of success. When the incipient storm goes through those fragile phases more rapidly, the risk of death by the onset of unfavorable large-scale factors such as wind shear or upper-level subsidence is reduced. Daisy developed in an inactive, moist environment with light, variable winds throughout the troposphere while in Oliver, strong divergent upper outflow apparently outweighed strong wind shear, although the latter was responsible for a slow and messy development of a closed, circular eye. In both storms, the hot towers in the major rainband were taller and stronger than those in the early eyewall. One-dimensional time-dependent model runs were used to simulate both in Oliver with two important results: 1) the taller rainband clouds permitted greater high level heating, if it could be retained; and 2) greater electrification and more lighting occurred in the rainband although the partial eyewall clouds also showed strong electrification. Airborne radar, electrification measurements and models are fitted together to understand their relationship. An important result is the clear inference that fairly deep mixed phase regions existed in both eyewall and rainband, in which the DC-8 aircraft experienced liquid water at temperatures colder than -40 degrees C below freezing. These results show that the claims of no supercooled liquid water in tropical cyclones require re-examination with the proper measurements of electrification that are now feasible.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0177-7971
1436-5065
DOI:10.1007/bf01277500