Electronic medical records and diabetes quality of care: results from a sample of family medicine practices

• Published in: Annals of family medicine Vol. 5; no. 3; pp. 209 - 215
• Main Authors: Crosson, Jesse C, Ohman-Strickland, Pamela A, Hahn, Karissa A, DiCicco-Bloom, Barbara, Shaw, Eric, Orzano, A John, Crabtree, Benjamin F
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Copyright 2007 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc 01.05.2007
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus - therapy; Family Practice; Female; Guideline Adherence; Humans; Male; Medical Audit; Medical Records Systems, Computerized; Middle Aged; Original Research; Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care); Practice Guidelines as Topic; Retrospective Studies
• ISSN: 1544-1709; 1544-1717
• DOI: 10.1370/afm.696

Care of patients with diabetes requires management of complex clinical information, which may be improved by the use of an electronic medical record (EMR); however, the actual relationship between EMR usage and diabetes care quality in primary care settings is not well understood. We assessed the relationship between EMR usage and diabetes care quality in a sample of family medicine practices. We conducted cross-sectional analyses of baseline data from 50 practices participating in a practice improvement study. Between April 2003 and December 2004 chart auditors reviewed a random sample of medical records from patients with diabetes in each practice for adherence to guidelines for diabetes processes of care, treatment, and achievement of intermediate outcomes. Practice leaders provided medical record system information. We conducted multivariate analyses of the relationship between EMR usage and diabetes care adjusting for potential practice- and patient-level confounders and practice-level clustering. Diabetes care quality in all practices showed room for improvement; however, after adjustment, patient care in the 37 practices not using an EMR was more likely to meet guidelines for process (odds ratio [OR], 2.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42-3.57) treatment (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.07-2.60), and intermediate outcomes (OR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.49-4.82) than in the 13 practices using an EMR. The use of an EMR in primary care practices is insufficient for insuring high-quality diabetes care. Efforts to expand EMR use should focus not only on improving technology but also on developing methods for implementing and integrating this technology into practice reality.