Neuromodulation of somatosensory pain thresholds of the neck musculature using a novel transcranial direct current stimulation montage: a randomized double-blind, sham controlled study

• Published in: Scandinavian journal of pain Vol. 22; no. 3; pp. 622 - 630
• Main Authors: Kold, Sebastian, Kragh, Anna J., Graven-Nielsen, Christoffer S., Elnegaard, Frederikke S., Lund, Fredrik, Vittrup, Ida V., Cliff, Katja L., Sivarooban, Rathiba, Petrini, Laura
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Germany De Gruyter 26.07.2022
• Subjects: acute pain; Adult; Double-Blind Method; healthy subjects; Humans; Male; Motor Cortex - physiology; neuromodulation; Pain Threshold - physiology; primary motor cortex; primary sensory cortex; QST; quantitative sensory testing; Sensory Thresholds; tDCS; transcranial direct current stimulation; Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - methods; neuromodulation; QST; primary sensory cortex; acute pain; healthy subjects; tDCS; quantitative sensory testing; transcranial direct current stimulation; primary motor cortex
• ISSN: 1877-8860; 1877-8879
• DOI: 10.1515/sjpain-2021-0187

Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of primary motor cortex (M1) and cathodal of the primary sensory cortex (S1) have previously shown to modulate the sensory thresholds when administered with the reference electrode located over the contralateral supraorbital area (SO). Combining the two stimulation paradigms into one with simultaneous stimulation of the two brain areas (M1 + S1 - tDCS) may result in a synergistic effect inducing a prominent neuromodulation, noticeable in the pain thresholds. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of the novel M1 + S1 - tDCS montage compared to sham-stimulation in modulating the pain thresholds in healthy adults. Thirty-nine (20 males) subjects were randomly assigned to either receiving 20 min. active M1 + S1 - tDCS or sham tDCS in a double-blinded single session study. Thermal and mechanical pain thresholds were assessed before and after the intervention. There were no significant differences in the pain thresholds within either group, or between the M1 + S1 - tDCS group and the Sham-tDCS group (p>0.05), indicating that the intervention was ineffective in inducing a neuromodulation of the somatosensory system. Experimental investigations of novel tDCS electrode montages, that are scientifically based on existing studies or computational modelling, are essential to establish better tDCS protocols. Here simultaneous transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex and primary sensory cortex showed no effect on the pain thresholds of the neck musculature in healthy subjects. This tDCS montage may have been ineffective due to how the electrical field reaches the targeted neurons, or may have been limited by the design of a single tDCS administration. The study adds to the existing literature of the studies investigating effects of new tDCS montages with the aim of establishing novel non-invasive brain stimulation interventions for chronic neck pain rehabilitation. North Denmark Region Committee on Health Research Ethics (VN-20180085) ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04658485).