Combined Effect of Levels in Personal Self-Regulation and Regulatory Teaching on Meta-Cognitive, on Meta-Motivational, and on Academic Achievement Variables in Undergraduate Students

The . Externally-Regulated Learning™ (SRL vs. ERL) proposed different types of relationships among levels of variables in Personal Self-Regulation (PSR) and Regulatory Teaching (RT) to predict the meta-cognitive, meta-motivational and -emotional variables of learning, and of Academic Achievement in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 8; p. 232
Main Authors de la Fuente, Jesús, Sander, Paul, Martínez-Vicente, José M, Vera, Mariano, Garzón, Angélica, Fadda, Salvattore
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 23.02.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The . Externally-Regulated Learning™ (SRL vs. ERL) proposed different types of relationships among levels of variables in Personal Self-Regulation (PSR) and Regulatory Teaching (RT) to predict the meta-cognitive, meta-motivational and -emotional variables of learning, and of Academic Achievement in Higher Education. The aim of this investigation was empirical in order to validate the model of the combined effect of low-medium-high levels in PSR and RT on the dependent variables. For the analysis of combinations, a selected sample of 544 undergraduate students from two Spanish universities was used. Data collection was obtained from validated instruments, in Spanish versions. Using an ex-post-facto design, different Univariate and Multivariate Analyses (3 × 1, 3 × 3, and 4 × 1) were conducted. Results provide evidence for a consistent effect of levels of PSR and of RT, thus giving significant partial confirmation of the proposed rational model. As predicted, (1) the levels of PSR and positively and significantly effected the levels of learning approaches, resilience, engagement, academic confidence, test anxiety, and procedural and attitudinal academic achievement; (2) the most favorable type of interaction a high level of PSR with a high level RT process. The limitations and implications of these results in the design of effective teaching are analyzed, to improve university teaching-learning processes.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Educational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Reviewed by: Leonard Bliss, Florida International University, USA; Eva M. Romera, University of Córdoba, Spain
Edited by: Pablo Fernández-Berrocal, University of Málaga, Spain
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00232