Histologic Outcomes With Vedolizumab Versus Adalimumab in Ulcerative Colitis: Results From An Efficacy and Safety Study of Vedolizumab Intravenous Compared to Adalimumab Subcutaneous in Participants With Ulcerative Colitis (VARSITY)

VARSITY (An Efficacy and Safety Study of Vedolizumab Intravenous [IV] Compared to Adalimumab Subcutaneous [SC] in Participants With Ulcerative Colitis) showed superior clinical remission and endoscopic improvement in ulcerative colitis with vedolizumab vs adalimumab. This analysis compared histologi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943) Vol. 161; no. 4; pp. 1156 - 1167.e3
Main Authors Peyrin-Biroulet, Laurent, Loftus, Edward V., Colombel, Jean-Frédéric, Danese, Silvio, Rogers, Raquel, Bornstein, Jeffrey D., Chen, Jingjing, Schreiber, Stefan, Sands, Bruce E., Lirio, Richard A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.10.2021
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:VARSITY (An Efficacy and Safety Study of Vedolizumab Intravenous [IV] Compared to Adalimumab Subcutaneous [SC] in Participants With Ulcerative Colitis) showed superior clinical remission and endoscopic improvement in ulcerative colitis with vedolizumab vs adalimumab. This analysis compared histologic outcomes. Patients in VARSITY were randomized 1:1 to maintenance with vedolizumab IV 300 mg every 8 weeks or adalimumab SC 40 mg every 2 weeks (both following standard induction). Geboes Index and Robarts Histopathology Index (RHI) scores were used to assess prespecified histologic exploratory end points of histologic remission (Geboes <2 or RHI ≤2) and minimal histologic disease activity (Geboes ≤3.1 or RHI ≤4) at weeks 14 and 52. In total, 769 patients received vedolizumab (n = 383) or adalimumab (n = 386). Mean baseline histologic disease activity was similar between vedolizumab and adalimumab groups. Vedolizumab induced greater histologic remission than adalimumab at week 14 (Geboes: 16.7% vs 7.3%, Δ9.4% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 4.9%–13.9%], P < .0001; RHI: 25.6% vs 16.1%, Δ9.5% [95% CI, 3.8%–15.2%], P = .0011) and week 52 (Geboes: 29.2% vs 8.3%, Δ20.9% [95% CI, 15.6%–26.2%], P < .0001; RHI: 37.6% vs 19.9%, Δ17.6% [95% CI, 11.3%–23.8%], P < .0001) overall and in both anti–tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-naïve and -failure subgroups. Results were similar for minimal histologic disease activity. Histologic outcomes were generally better in anti–TNF-naïve vs -failure patients. At week 52, rates of mucosal healing (composite end point of histologic plus endoscopic improvement) were also higher with vedolizumab than adalimumab (Geboes: 25.6% vs 6.7%; RHI: 30.5% vs 14.5%). Higher rates of histologic remission, minimal histologic disease activity, and combined histologic plus endoscopic outcomes were observed with vedolizumab than with adalimumab in ulcerative colitis in both anti–TNF-naïve and -failure subgroups. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02497469; EudraCT 2015-000939-33 [Display omitted] In An Efficacy and Safety Study of Vedolizumab Intravenous (IV) Compared to Adalimumab Subcutaneous (SC) in Participants With Ulcerative Colitis (VARSITY), vedolizumab was superior to adalimumab in restoring normal gut histology in ulcerative colitis, with significant differences in both anti–tumor necrosis factor-naïve and -failure subgroups at weeks 14 and 52.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-2
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0016-5085
1528-0012
DOI:10.1053/j.gastro.2021.06.015