Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for giant rectal tumors larger than 8 cm: A European referral center experience

To date, western data on colorectal ESD are limited. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of rectal ESD for superficial lesions ≥ 8 cm. A total of 138 superficial rectal neoplasms treated by ESD were allocated in two groups: 25 in the “giant” ESD group and 113 in the control group. En...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDigestive and liver disease Vol. 55; no. 10; pp. 1391 - 1396
Main Authors Barbaro, Federico, Ciuffini, Cristina, Chiappetta, Michele Francesco, Papparella, Luigi Giovanni, Pecere, Silvia, Ricci, Riccardo, Familiari, Pietro, Petruzziello, Lucio, Spada, Cristiano, Costamagna, Guido
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To date, western data on colorectal ESD are limited. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of rectal ESD for superficial lesions ≥ 8 cm. A total of 138 superficial rectal neoplasms treated by ESD were allocated in two groups: 25 in the “giant” ESD group and 113 in the control group. En bloc resection was achieved in 96% of cases in both groups. En bloc R0 resection rate was similar between the “giant” ESD group and the control group (84% vs 86%; p: 0.5) and curative resection was higher in the control group (81%) than in “giant” ESD group (68%) without reaching statistical significance (p: 0.2). Dissection time was significantly longer in the “giant” ESD group (251 vs 108 min; p <0.001), however, dissection speed was significantly higher (0.35 vs 0.17 cm2/min; p: 0.02).). Post-ESD stenosis was observed in 2 patients from the “giant” ESD group (8% vs 0% of control group, p: 0.03). No significant differences were found in delayed bleeding, perforation, local recurrences, and need for additional surgery. ESD for superficial rectal tumors ≥ 8 cm is a feasible, safe, and effective therapeutic option.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1590-8658
1878-3562
DOI:10.1016/j.dld.2023.05.032