Characterizing healthy knee symmetry using the finite helical axis and muscle power during open and closed chain tasks

• Published in: Journal of biomechanics Vol. 99; p. 109580
• Main Authors: Bishop, Emily L., Kuntze, Gregor, Ronsky, Janet L.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Ltd 23.01.2020; Elsevier Limited
• Subjects: Asymmetry; Chains; Closed chain; Electromyography; Finite helical axis; Injuries; Joint geometry; Joint stability; Joints (anatomy); Kinematics; Knee; Leg; Limbs; Muscles; Neuromuscular system; Open chain; Symmetry; Wavelet analysis; United States > US; Wavelet analysis; Closed chain; Joint stability; Finite helical axis; Open chain
• ISSN: 0021-9290; 1873-2380
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109580

Understanding healthy joint movement and muscle control, and injurious alterations, is important to determine musculoskeletal contributions to post-injury joint instabilities or altered dynamic joint function. The contralateral limb is often used as a point of reference to determine the effects of knee joint injury. However, it is currently difficult to interpret within subject variability between limbs as this is not well established in the healthy population. There is a continuing need to characterize healthy knee joint mechanics and neuromuscular control to determine the degree of symmetry within healthy individuals. The current study quantified limb symmetry in healthy individuals using the finite helical axis with a unique reference position (rFHA) and electromyography (EMG) approaches, for a closed-chain single leg squat (SLS) and an open-chain seated leg swing. Muscle power and FHA translation, orientation and dispersion were similar between limbs. However, the FHA was located significantly more anterior in the dominant limb relative to the contralateral during both tasks. These between-limb differences in FHA location could be attributed to differences in joint geometry and strength between limbs. This finding provides evidence that healthy knees have asymmetries which have implications for selection of control limbs in studies comparing conditions within and between individuals. Differences identified in dynamic joint function between tasks suggest that the SLS is useful for revealing joint asymmetries due to altered muscular control strategies, while the swing task is expected to highlight asymmetries in joint motion due to altered knee structures following injury.