Robotic arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: high survivorship and good patient-related outcomes at a minimum five years of follow-up

• Published in: Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA Vol. 29; no. 10; pp. 3316 - 3322
• Main Authors: Zambianchi, Francesco, Daffara, Valerio, Franceschi, Giorgio, Banchelli, Federico, Marcovigi, Andrea, Catani, Fabio
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.10.2021; John Wiley & Sons, Inc
• Subjects: Age factors; Arthroplasty (knee); Body mass; Body mass index; Body size; Joint replacement surgery; Joint surgery; Joints (anatomy); Knee; Males; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Orthopedics; Pain; Patient satisfaction; Patients; Revisions; Robot arms; Robotic surgery; Sports Medicine; Survival; Survivor; UKA; Robotic arm-assisted; Mid-term; Survival; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
• ISSN: 0942-2056; 1433-7347; 1433-7347
• DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06198-9

Purpose Robotic arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (RA-UKA) has been shown to improve component placement, reduce intraoperative variability, increase patient satisfaction and improve short-term survivorship results. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the incidence of revision and the clinical performance at a minimum of 5-year follow-up for a cohort of patients who received a medial RA-UKA. Methods Between April 2011 and July 2013, a total of 254 patients underwent medial RA-UKA at a single centre. Clinical performance was investigated using the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) and a 5-level Likert scale made of five items to assess joint perception and patient satisfaction. Kaplan–Meier implant survivorship was calculated and reasons for revision were collected. The effect of age, gender and body mass index (BMI) on the probability of reporting high FJS-12 and satisfaction were assessed. Results After considering exclusion criteria and loss to follow-up, a total of 216 patients (224 medial RA-UKAs) were assessed at a mean 5.9 years of follow-up. Five RA-UKAs underwent implant revision, resulting in an overall Kaplan–Meier survivorship of 97.8%. Unexplained knee pain (0.9%) was the most common reason for RA-UKA revision. Good-to-excellent FJS-12 scores and high satisfaction levels were reported at mid-term follow-up. Male patients had higher probability of having FJS-12 > 90 ( p  < 0.05) and high satisfaction levels ( p  < 0.05). Conclusions RA-UKAs demonstrated high survivorship and good-to-excellent patient-reported outcome measures and satisfaction levels at minimum 5-year follow-up. Results for male patients had improved clinical performance when compared to female subjects. Level of evidence IV.