Different subgroups of high-scorers on the TAS-20 based on the big five personality traits

•We examine if the alexithymia trait is properly obtained by high scorers on TAS-20.•Two distinct subgroups are identified based on the big five personality traits.•One shows very high scores on difficulty in identifying feelings and neuroticism.•The other shows very high scores on externally orient...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPersonality and individual differences Vol. 68; pp. 71 - 76
Main Authors Ueno, Mayumi, Maeda, Motonari, Komaki, Gen
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2014
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•We examine if the alexithymia trait is properly obtained by high scorers on TAS-20.•Two distinct subgroups are identified based on the big five personality traits.•One shows very high scores on difficulty in identifying feelings and neuroticism.•The other shows very high scores on externally oriented thinking and low openness.•TAS-20 total scores should not be used as a uni-dimensional measure of alexithymia. We investigated whether it was possible to obtain a consistent representation of the alexithymia trait by using the twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20). TAS-20 and the NEO-Five Factor Inventory were administered to nonclinical participants (N=2188). The results of hierarchical cluster analysis and a two-way analysis of variance indicated two subgroups with high scores on the TAS-20. One group had difficulty identifying feelings and high neuroticism; the other had a high externally oriented cognitive style and low openness to experience. These results suggest that the total score on the TAS-20 should not be considered a uni-dimensional measure of alexithymia.
ISSN:0191-8869
1873-3549
DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2014.04.012