A 13.2 mg epinephrine intranasal spray demonstrates comparable pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety to a 0.3 mg epinephrine autoinjector

Recent acute anaphylaxis guideline updates have identified remaining unmet needs based on currently available therapeutic options as a critical focus. We compared the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, safety, and tolerability profiles of intranasal epinephrine with intramuscular epinephrine administ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global Vol. 3; no. 2; p. 100200
Main Authors Dworaczyk, David A., Hunt, Allen L., Di Spirito, Mike, Lor, Mary, Dretchen, Kenneth L., Lamson, Michael J., Pollock, Jonathan, Ward, Thelma
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.05.2024
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Recent acute anaphylaxis guideline updates have identified remaining unmet needs based on currently available therapeutic options as a critical focus. We compared the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, safety, and tolerability profiles of intranasal epinephrine with intramuscular epinephrine administered by autoinjector and manual syringe. An open-label, 3-period crossover study was conducted in 116 healthy adult volunteers to assess the bioavailability of a single 13.2 mg intranasal dose of epinephrine compared to a 0.3 mg intramuscular autoinjector and a 0.5 mg manual syringe. Patients with epinephrine concentrations of 50, 100, and 200 pg/mL at 10, 20, 30, and 60 minutes after dosing were also evaluated. Pharmacokinetic parameters for the 13.2 mg intranasal dose exceeded those of the 0.3 mg autoinjector with a rapid and higher maximum observed concentration (intranasal, 429.4 pg/mL; autoinjector, 328.6 pg/mL) and greater systemic exposure (AUC0-360; intranasal, 39,060 pg∙min/mL; autoinjector, 17,440 pg∙min/mL). Similar results were observed compared to the 0.5 mg manual syringe. Pharmacokinetic parameters for opposite-nostril and same-nostril dosing were higher than both intramuscular doses, except time to reach maximum observed concentration, which was bracketed between the 2 intramuscular doses (intranasal opposite and same nostril, 20 minutes; autoinjector, 14.9 minutes; manual syringe, 45 minutes). Similar effects on blood pressure and heart rate were observed for intranasal and autoinjector administration. Intranasal epinephrine was safe and well tolerated. No serious or unexpected adverse events were reported, confirming results from earlier clinical studies. Bidose epinephrine spray addresses the unmet medical and patient needs for a needle-free, convenient, and effective dose-delivery system for self-administration of epinephrine that is as good as or better than the 0.3 mg autoinjector.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2772-8293
2772-8293
DOI:10.1016/j.jacig.2023.100200