Tick-borne encephalitis virus vaccination breakthrough infections in Germany: a retrospective analysis from 2001 to 2018
There are few data available regarding the clinical course of tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) vaccination breakthrough infections. The published studies suggest that vaccination breakthrough infections may have a more severe course than native TBEV infection in unvaccinated individuals—potentia...
Saved in:
Published in | Clinical microbiology and infection Vol. 26; no. 8; pp. 1090.e7 - 1090.e13 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Elsevier Ltd
01.08.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | There are few data available regarding the clinical course of tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) vaccination breakthrough infections. The published studies suggest that vaccination breakthrough infections may have a more severe course than native TBEV infection in unvaccinated individuals—potentially due to antibody-dependent enhancement. Here we report a large analysis of vaccination breakthrough infections.
This retrospective analysis was based on a national surveillance dataset spanning the years 2001–2018. Variables reflecting disease severity, such as ‘CNS symptoms’, ‘myelitis’, ‘fatal outcome’ and ‘hospitalization’ were analysed as well as general epidemiological variables. Cases were categorized as ‘unvaccinated’ or ‘ever vaccinated’, the latter category including cases with at least one dose of a TBEV vaccine.
A total of 6073 notified TBEV infection cases were included in our analysis. Sufficient data on vaccination status were available for 95.1% of patients (5777/6073); of these, 5298 presented with a native infection. A total of (334/5777) cases developed an infection despite having been vaccinated at least once. Comparing unvaccinated patients with those with at least one vaccination, we find an odds ratio (OR) 2.73, (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79–9.50) regarding the variable fatal outcome that did not reach statistical significance. Analysing the clinical variables ‘CNS symptoms’ and ‘myelitis’, there is no difference between these groups (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.68–1.08; and OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.74–2.27 respectively). Patients who were vaccinated and had an assumed protection at symptom onset (n = 100) had a higher risk for the development of myelitic symptoms (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.01–4.86]) than unvaccinated patients.
Our findings could neither verify that vaccination breakthrough infections might cause a more severe disease than native infections nor prove a clear antibody-dependent enhancement phenomenon. It remains unclear whether the increased myelitis risk in a subgroup of vaccinated patients is a true effect or confounded. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1198-743X 1469-0691 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.12.001 |