Individualized Early Prediction of Familial Risk of Dyslexia: A Study of Infant Vocabulary Development

We examined early vocabulary development in children at familial risk (FR) of dyslexia and typically developing (TD) children between 17 and 35 months of age. We trained a support vector machine to classify TD and FR using these vocabulary data at the level. The Dutch version of the McArthur-Bates C...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 8; p. 156
Main Authors Chen, Ao, Wijnen, Frank, Koster, Charlotte, Schnack, Hugo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 21.02.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00156

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We examined early vocabulary development in children at familial risk (FR) of dyslexia and typically developing (TD) children between 17 and 35 months of age. We trained a support vector machine to classify TD and FR using these vocabulary data at the level. The Dutch version of the McArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory (Words and Sentences) (N-CDI) was used to measure vocabulary development. We analyzed group-level differences for both total vocabulary as well as lexical classes: common nouns, predicates, and closed class words. The generalizability of the classification model was tested using cross-validation. At the group level, for both total vocabulary and the composites, the difference between TD and FR was most pronounced at 19-20 months, with FRs having lower scores. For the individual prediction, highest cross-validation accuracy (68%) was obtained at 19-20 months, with sensitivity (correctly classified FR) being 70% and specificity (correctly classified TD) being 67%. There is a sensitive window in which the difference between FR and TD is most evident. Machine learning methods are promising techniques for separating FR and TD children at an early age, before they start reading.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by: Xi-Nian Zuo, Institute of Psychology (CAS), China
This article was submitted to Cognitive Science, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Reviewed by: Hong-Yan Bi, Institute of Psychology (CAS), China; Maki Sophia Koyama, University of Oxford, UK
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00156