Understanding profit margins of medical providers from prescription drugs: evidence from Taiwan

This study empirically estimates the magnitude and associated determinants of profit margins that medical providers earn from prescription drugs based on Taiwan's pharmaceutical market. Our main data set is from the population-based claims data compiled by the National Health Insurance Research...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational health Vol. 12; no. 4; pp. 272 - 280
Main Author Liu, Ya-Ming
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Oxford University Press 01.07.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study empirically estimates the magnitude and associated determinants of profit margins that medical providers earn from prescription drugs based on Taiwan's pharmaceutical market. Our main data set is from the population-based claims data compiled by the National Health Insurance Research Database covering three waves of price adjustment: July-December 2004, October 2007-September 2008 and October 2009-September 2010. Only drugs whose reimbursement prices were adjusted using the R-zone formula were used as samples for this study. By calculating the difference between retail and wholesale prices for 796 pharmaceutical products, we can estimate the profit margin determinants using the regression model. We found evidence that suppliers of generic drugs tend to offer larger discounts to medical providers than suppliers of brand-name drugs. In addition, the countervailing power of wholesale pharmaceuticals, as measured by the discount rate offered by pharmaceutical manufacturers, is positively associated with the degree of competition within the pharmaceutical market and the size of the market itself. Our findings imply that the profit-seeking behaviour exhibited by medical providers is the engine of competitive forces in Taiwan's prescription drug market. This creates financial incentives for them, which in turn influences their choices of prescription drugs.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1876-3413
1876-3405
1876-3405
DOI:10.1093/inthealth/ihz072