Coaching patients in the use of decision and communication aids: RE-AIM evaluation of a patient support program

• Published in: BMC health services research Vol. 15; no. 1; p. 209
• Main Authors: Belkora, Jeff, Volz, Shelley, Loth, Meredith, Teng, Alexandra, Zarin-Pass, Margot, Moore, Dan, Esserman, Laura
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 28.05.2015; BioMed Central
• Subjects: Adult; Breast Neoplasms - therapy; California; Communication; Decision Making; Decision Support Techniques; Female; Health Personnel - education; Humans; Male; Market surveys; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Middle Aged; Patient education; Patient Education as Topic - methods; Patient satisfaction; Program Evaluation; Surveys and Questionnaires; California
• ISSN: 1472-6963; 1472-6963
• DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-0872-6

Decision aids educate patients about treatment options and outcomes. Communication aids include question lists, consultation summaries, and audio-recordings. In efficacy studies, decision aids increased patient knowledge, while communication aids increased patient question-asking and information recall. Starting in 2004, we trained successive cohorts of post-baccalaureate, pre-medical interns to coach patients in the use of decision and communication aids at our university-based breast cancer clinic. From July 2005 through June 2012, we used the RE-AIM framework to measure Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance of our interventions. 1. Reach: Over the study period, our program sent a total of 5,153 decision aids and directly administered 2,004 communication aids. In the most recent program year (2012), out of 1,524 eligible patient appointments, we successfully contacted 1,212 (80%); coached 1,110 (73%) in the self-administered use of decision and communication aids; sent 958 (63%) decision aids; and directly administered communication aids for 419 (27%) patients. In a 2010 survey, coached patients reported self-administering one or more communication aids in 81% of visits 2. Effectiveness: In our pre-post comparisons, decision aids were associated with increased patient knowledge and decreased decisional conflict. Communication aids were associated with increased self-efficacy and number of questions; and with high ratings of patient preparedness and satisfaction 3. Adoption: Among visitors sent decision aids, 82% of survey respondents reviewed some or all; among those administered communication aids, 86% reviewed one or more after the visit 4. Through continuous quality adaptations, we increased the proportion of available staff time used for patient support (i.e. exploitation of workforce capacity) from 29% in 2005 to 84% in 2012 5. Maintenance: The main barrier to sustainability was the cost of paid intern labor. We addressed this by testing a service learning model in which student interns work as program coaches in exchange for academic credit rather than salary. The feasibility test succeeded, and we are now expanding the use of unpaid interns. We have sustained a clinic-wide implementation of decision and communication aids through a novel staffing model that uses paid and unpaid student interns as coaches.