Quality of life and response to treatment in cats with hypersomatotropism: the owners’ point of view

Objectives The aim of this study was to collect clinical information from owners of cats with hypersomatotropism (HS) distributed worldwide, assessing the impact of HS and its treatments on cats’ quality of life (QoL) and survival time. Methods A survey focused on clinical presentation, diagnostic p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of feline medicine and surgery Vol. 24; no. 8; pp. e175 - e182
Main Authors Corsini, Andrea, Niessen, Stijn JM, Miceli, Diego D, Caney, Sarah, Zeugswetter, Florian K, Sieber-Ruckstuhl, Nadja S, Arenas, Carolina, Fleeman, Linda M, Leal, Rodolfo O, Battellino, Martina, Fracassi, Federico
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.08.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objectives The aim of this study was to collect clinical information from owners of cats with hypersomatotropism (HS) distributed worldwide, assessing the impact of HS and its treatments on cats’ quality of life (QoL) and survival time. Methods A survey focused on clinical presentation, diagnostic procedures, treatments, cats’ QoL and disease progression was distributed worldwide to owners of cats with HS. The owner’s perception of the cats’ QoL before and after or during treatment was defined using a score ranging from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent). Improvement following treatment (IFT) was quantified using a score ranging from 1 (absent) to 5 (obvious). Different treatment groups, including at least five cases, were compared. Results A total of 127 cats were included from at least 11 different countries. Among these, 120 (95%) were diabetic and 7 (5%) were not. Out of 120 diabetic cats, 55 (46%) were treated with insulin as a single treatment (INS). Other treatments were not mentioned to owners in 35/120 (29%) cases. The median QoL score at diagnosis was 2 (range 1–5) and improved after treatment in all groups. Cabergoline (4; range 1–5), radiotherapy (4; range 2–5) and hypophysectomy (5; range 4–5) showed better median IFT scores compared with INS (3; range 1–5) (P = 0.046, P <0.002 and P <0.0001, respectively). Hypophysectomy IFT proved superior to cabergoline (P = 0.047) and was equal to radiotherapy IFT (P = 0.32). No difference was found between cabergoline and radiotherapy IFT (P = 0.99). The median survival time (MST) was 24 months (range 0–75 months). Cats treated with INS showed shorter MST (22 months; range 0–69 months) compared with cats treated with causal treatments combined (36 months; range 3–75 months) (P = 0.04). Conclusions and relevance Not all cats with HS will have diabetes mellitus. Causal treatments seem associated with the greatest improvements in perceived cats’ QoL and survival; such treatments should therefore be discussed with owners. Cabergoline could be an effective alternative management option.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1098-612X
1532-2750
1532-2750
DOI:10.1177/1098612X221098718