Analytical comparison of frequency compensation techniques in three-stage amplifiers

In this paper, design equations of the most common Nested Miller topologies are derived. Moreover, a coherent and comprehensive analytical comparison among the different topologies is also presented. In particular, after deriving design equations, following the approach previously proposed by the au...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of circuit theory and applications Vol. 36; no. 1; pp. 53 - 80
Main Authors Grasso, A. D., Palumbo, G., Pennisi, S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.01.2008
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In this paper, design equations of the most common Nested Miller topologies are derived. Moreover, a coherent and comprehensive analytical comparison among the different topologies is also presented. In particular, after deriving design equations, following the approach previously proposed by the authors that have the phase margin as the main design parameter, the different solutions are compared by evaluating a novel figure of merit that expresses a trade‐off between gain‐bandwidth product, load capacitance and total transconductance, for equal values of phase margin. It is shown that there is no unique optimal solution as this depends on the load condition and the relative magnitude of the transconductance of each stage. From this point of view, the proposed comparison also provides useful design guidelines for the optimization of small‐signal performance. Simulations confirming the effectiveness of the comparison are also given. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-DHNWKWH1-8
ArticleID:CTA397
istex:5805DF98D7F316102CA2D0B708B1B07C7BC3105C
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0098-9886
1097-007X
DOI:10.1002/cta.397