Comparing cold-air analgesia, systemically administered analgesia and scalp nerve blocks for pain management during photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis of the scalp presenting as field cancerization: a randomized controlled trial

Summary Background Photodynamic therapy (PDT) using methyl aminolaevulinate (MAL) is an effective treatment for extensive actinic keratosis (AK). However, pain is a major side‐effect of this therapy. Objectives To investigate whether scalp nerve blocks (group 1) provide adequate pain relief during M...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of dermatology (1951) Vol. 173; no. 1; pp. 192 - 200
Main Authors Klein, A., Karrer, S., Horner, C., Werner, A., Heinlin, J., Zeman, F., Koller, M., Landthaler, M., Szeimies, R.-M., Gruber, M., Graf, B., Hansen, E., Kerscher, C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.07.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary Background Photodynamic therapy (PDT) using methyl aminolaevulinate (MAL) is an effective treatment for extensive actinic keratosis (AK). However, pain is a major side‐effect of this therapy. Objectives To investigate whether scalp nerve blocks (group 1) provide adequate pain relief during MAL‐PDT of the scalp and forehead in 32 men with baldness. Methods The patients received intravenous (IV) analgesia [piritramide 7·5 mg IV, plus oral metamizole (40 drops 30 min prior to PDT)] in combination with cold‐air analgesia (group 2; IV analgesia) and cold‐air analgesia alone (group 3). Maximum pain was evaluated by means of a visual analogue scale (VAS) during and up to 300 min after PDT. Pain during PDT was further analysed according to a pain perception scale. Furthermore, we measured haemodynamics and investigated stress hormone levels in blood samples at different time points. Results Maximum pain during PDT (primary end point) was significantly reduced in the treatment group receiving scalp nerve blocks (VAS 2·1 ± 1·3) compared with the treatment groups receiving IV analgesia (VAS 7·3 ± 1·1) and cold‐air analgesia (VAS 8·4 ± 2·0; P < 0·05). No significant difference was found between groups 2 and 3 with regard to pain relief (P = 0·32). The increase in systolic blood pressure during the first 3 min of PDT was significantly lower for group 1 than for groups 2 and 3 (P < 0·001). No correlation between stress hormone levels and pain were found. Conclusions Scalp nerve blocks provide an effective method for pain management during PDT for patients with extensive AK. What's already known about this topic? Pain is a common and significant side‐effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT). Scalp nerve blocks are an effective pain reduction strategy during PDT in patients with field cancerization. What does this study add? To the best of our knowledge, this is the first randomized controlled trial comparing scalp nerve blocks, intravenously administered analgesia in combination with cold‐air analgesia and cold‐air analgesia alone for managing pain during PDT. In contrast to scalp nerve blocks, intravenously administered analgesia and cold‐air analgesia did not lead to a considerable reduction in pain.
Bibliography:ArticleID:BJD13547
ark:/67375/WNG-DMZRGN8M-T
istex:1B2C51104B90F5F909A9182536939BB8952CEDC9
Conflicts of interest
Methyl aminolaevulinate cream (Metvix®) was provided by Galderma Laboratorium GmbH, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Funding sources
None declared.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0007-0963
1365-2133
DOI:10.1111/bjd.13547