Efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring in people living with diabetes and end stage kidney disease on dialysis: a systematic review

Patients with diabetes on dialysis experience wide variations in glucose levels and an increased risk of hypoglycaemia. Due to the inaccuracies of HbA1c in dialysis patients, JBDS-IP and KDIGO recommend the use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). We conducted a systematic review to examine the c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC nephrology Vol. 25; no. 1; pp. 379 - 8
Main Authors Zhang, Yimeng, Singh, Pushpa, Ganapathy, Kavitha, Suresh, Vijayan, Karamat, Muhammad Ali, Baharani, Jyoti, Bellary, Srikanth
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 25.10.2024
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Patients with diabetes on dialysis experience wide variations in glucose levels and an increased risk of hypoglycaemia. Due to the inaccuracies of HbA1c in dialysis patients, JBDS-IP and KDIGO recommend the use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). We conducted a systematic review to examine the current evidence for CGM use and its impact on clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes on dialysis. A search of MEDLINE(R) ALL, Ovid Emcare, Journals@Ovid Full Text and Embase databases were conducted. Clinical or observational trials in adults with Type 1(T1D) or Type 2 (T2D) diabetes on dialysis and CGM intervention reporting on glycaemic outcomes were included. Of the 936 citations identified, 49 duplicates were removed. 887 citations were screened by title and abstract. 9 full texts were reviewed and a further 7 excluded due to duplications or failure to meet to selection criteria. Data was extracted for 2 studies, both prospective before-and-after interventional studies with no control group. Joubert et al. (2015) showed results for 15 participants with T1D. Mean CGM glucose level decreased from 8.37mmol/L at baseline to 7.7mmol/L at the end of the CGM period (p < 0.05) while HbA1c decreased from 6.9 to 6.5% (p < 0.05) during the same period. Mean CGM was lower on dialysis days (7.68mmol/L vs. 7.8mmol/L, p < 0.05). Képénékian et al. (2014) reported on data from 29 T2D patients. Following a 3 month CGM-adapted insulin regimen, HbA1c decreased from 8.4% at baseline to 7.6% (p < 0.01) by the end of study. Mean CGM values decreased from 9.9mmol/L to 8.9mmol/L (p = 0.05) and the frequency of glucose values > 10mmol/L decreased from 41 to 30% (p < 0.05), without a significant increase in hypoglycaemia frequency. Both studies were deemed to be of 'good' quality. Evidence demonstrating the benefits of CGM in patients with diabetes receiving dialysis is lacking. There is a need for well-designed randomised controlled trials to ascertain the benefits of this technology in this patient group. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023371635, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=371635 .
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Review-4
content type line 23
ISSN:1471-2369
1471-2369
DOI:10.1186/s12882-024-03763-z