Should businesses take a stand? Effects of perceived psychological distance on consumers' expectation and evaluation of corporate social advocacy
Nowadays companies are increasingly engaging in social-political issues. In light of the Construal Level Theory, this study examined the polarizing/depolarizing effects of perceived psychological distance on consumers' expectation of corporate social advocacy and evaluations among consumers fro...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of marketing communications Vol. 28; no. 8; pp. 840 - 863 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
Routledge
17.11.2022
Taylor & Francis Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Nowadays companies are increasingly engaging in social-political issues. In light of the Construal Level Theory, this study examined the polarizing/depolarizing effects of perceived psychological distance on consumers' expectation of corporate social advocacy and evaluations among consumers from different partisan identities. A between-subjects experiment (N = 296) with a continuous independent variable - perceived psychological distance - was employed. The study found that consumers with a closer perceived psychological distance to the company tended to have a higher expectation of corporate social advocacy. However, perceptions of psychological distance resulted in mixed effects regarding people's attitudes and buycott/boycott intentions, where consumer-company identification mediated these relationships. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 1352-7266 1466-4445 |
DOI: | 10.1080/13527266.2021.1969588 |