Coordinating culture change across the research landscape
Scientific integrity necessitates applying scientific methods properly, collecting and analyzing data appropriately, protecting human subjects rightly, performing studies rigorously, and communicating findings transparently. But who is responsible for upholding research integrity, mitigating misinfo...
Saved in:
Published in | Frontiers in research metrics and analytics Vol. 8; p. 1134082 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Frontiers Media S.A
10.08.2023
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2504-0537 2504-0537 |
DOI | 10.3389/frma.2023.1134082 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Scientific integrity necessitates applying scientific methods properly, collecting and analyzing data appropriately, protecting human subjects rightly, performing studies rigorously, and communicating findings transparently. But who is responsible for upholding research integrity, mitigating misinformation, and increasing trust in science beyond individual researchers? We posit that supporting the scientific reputation requires a coordinated approach across all stakeholders: funding agencies, publishers, scholarly societies, research institutions, and journalists and media, and policy-makers. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Reviewed by: Ángel Borrego, University of Barcelona, Spain Edited by: Linda Suzanne O'Brien, Griffith Business School, Griffith University, Australia |
ISSN: | 2504-0537 2504-0537 |
DOI: | 10.3389/frma.2023.1134082 |