Detection of autism spectrum disorder using graph representation learning algorithms and deep neural network, based on fMRI signals

• Published in: Frontiers in systems neuroscience Vol. 16; p. 904770
• Main Authors: Yousefian, Ali, Shayegh, Farzaneh, Maleki, Zeinab
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 02.02.2023
• Subjects: autism spectrum disorder; AWE; connectivity; deep neural network (DNN); graph representation learning methods; Graph2Img; Neuroscience; graph representation learning methods; Graph2Img; connectivity; autism spectrum disorder; deep neural network (DNN); AWE
• ISSN: 1662-5137; 1662-5137
• DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2022.904770

Can we apply graph representation learning algorithms to identify autism spectrum disorder (ASD) patients within a large brain imaging dataset? ASD is mainly identified by brain functional connectivity patterns. Attempts to unveil the common neural patterns emerged in ASD are the essence of ASD classification. We claim that graph representation learning methods can appropriately extract the connectivity patterns of the brain, in such a way that the method can be generalized to every recording condition, and phenotypical information of subjects. These methods can capture the whole structure of the brain, both local and global properties. The investigation is done for the worldwide brain imaging multi-site database known as ABIDE I and II (Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange). Among different graph representation techniques, we used AWE, Node2vec, Struct2vec, multi node2vec, and Graph2Img. The best approach was Graph2Img, in which after extracting the feature vectors representative of the brain nodes, the PCA algorithm is applied to the matrix of feature vectors. The classifier adapted to the features embedded in graphs is an LeNet deep neural network. Although we could not outperform the previous accuracy of 10-fold cross-validation in the identification of ASD versus control patients in this dataset, for leave-one-site-out cross-validation, we could obtain better results (our accuracy: 80%). The result is that graph embedding methods can prepare the connectivity matrix more suitable for applying to a deep network.