Diesel engine emissions with oxygenated fuels: A comparative study into cold-start and hot-start operation

As biofuels are increasingly represented in the fuel market, the use of these oxygenated fuels should be evaluated under various engine operating conditions, such as cold-start. However, to-date quantification has been mostly done under hot-start engine operation. By using a custom test designed for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of cleaner production Vol. 162; pp. 997 - 1008
Main Authors Zare, Ali, Nabi, Md Nurun, Bodisco, Timothy A., Hossain, Farhad M., Rahman, M.M., Chu Van, Thuy, Ristovski, Zoran D., Brown, Richard J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 20.09.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:As biofuels are increasingly represented in the fuel market, the use of these oxygenated fuels should be evaluated under various engine operating conditions, such as cold-start. However, to-date quantification has been mostly done under hot-start engine operation. By using a custom test designed for this study, a comparative investigation was performed on exhaust emissions during cold- and hot-start with diesel and three oxygenated fuels based on waste cooking biodiesel and triacetin. This study used a six-cylinder, turbocharged, after-cooled diesel engine with a common rail injection system. The results during cold-start with diesel showed lower NOx (up to 15.4%), PN (up to 48%), PM1 (up to 44%) and PM2.5 (up to 63%). However, the oxygenated fuels during cold-start showed a significant increase in NOx (up to 94%), PN (up to 27 times), PM1 (up to 7.3 times) and PM2.5 (up to 5 times) relative to hot-start. The use of oxygenated fuels instead of diesel during hot-start decreased the PN, PM2.5 and PM1 (up to 91%) while, during cold-start, it only decreased PM1 and PM2.5 at some engine operating modes and increased PN significantly up to 17 times. In both cold- and hot-start, the use of oxygenated fuels resulted in an increase in NOx emission. For cold-start this was up to 125%, for hot-start it was up to 13.9%. In comparison with hot-start, the use of oxygenated fuels during cold-start increased nucleation mode particles significantly, which are harmful. This should be taken into consideration, since cold-start operation is an inevitable part of the daily driving schedule for a significantly high portion of vehicles, especially in cities. [Display omitted] •Waste cooking biodiesel and triacetin (highly oxygenated additive) were used.•Diesel during cold-start had lower NOx, PN, PM1 and PM2.5 than hot-start.•Oxygenated fuels during cold-start had lower NOx, PN, PM1 and PM2.5 than hot-start.•Oxygenated fuels during hot-start decreased PN, PM2.5 and PM1.•Oxygenated fuels during cold-start increased PN and nucleation mode particles.
ISSN:0959-6526
1879-1786
DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.052