Contrafreeloading, reinforcement rate, and behavioral momentum

•Contrafreeloading is responding for food in the presence of free, within-session food.•Greater training reinforcement rates increased persistence during within-session food.•Greater training reinforcement rates increased persistence following pre-session food.•Nevertheless, within- and pre-session...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBehavioural processes Vol. 128; pp. 24 - 28
Main Authors Podlesnik, Christopher A., Jimenez-Gomez, Corina
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.07.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Contrafreeloading is responding for food in the presence of free, within-session food.•Greater training reinforcement rates increased persistence during within-session food.•Greater training reinforcement rates increased persistence following pre-session food.•Nevertheless, within- and pre-session food produced different patterns of disruption.•These findings generally are consistent with the assertions of behavioral momentum. Contrafreeloading involves organisms working for food when an identical source of food is freely available. The present study assessed whether training reinforcement rates influenced contrafreeloading by arranging a within-subject and within-session design using pigeons. Across different alternating discriminative stimuli, variable-interval schedules arranged leaner (30 per hour) and richer (120 per hour) rates of food reinforcement. Responding decreased but persisted in the presence of free food during the session (i.e., contrafreeloading). Further, responding tended to be similar between components initially but greater persistence emerged in the richer component with additional exposure. With pre-session feeding, responding did not change systematically across test sessions and tended to be more persistent in the richer component. Greater persistence with greater training reinforcement rates is generally consistent with an influential theory of response persistence, behavioral momentum theory. However, the different patterns of responding across test sessions between pre- and within-session feeding reveals multiple behavioral processes involved in contrafreeloading that have yet to be fully understood. Behavioral momentum theory could provide a useful theoretical framework for understanding and quantifying the behavioral processes underlying contrafreeloading.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0376-6357
1872-8308
1872-8308
DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2016.03.022