Auditory brainstem responses during aerial testing with bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus): Effects of electrode and jawphone locations

Transmission of sound to dolphins during electrophysiological hearing screening is conducted out of water in certain cases (e.g., strandings). This necessitates that sound be delivered using a contact transducer either pressed against the skin or affixed to the jaw using a suction cup (i.e., "j...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Vol. 147; no. 4; p. 2525
Main Authors Mulsow, Jason, Finneran, James J, Accomando, Alyssa W, Burkard, Robert F
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.04.2020
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Transmission of sound to dolphins during electrophysiological hearing screening is conducted out of water in certain cases (e.g., strandings). This necessitates that sound be delivered using a contact transducer either pressed against the skin or affixed to the jaw using a suction cup (i.e., "jawphones"). This study examined how bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus, n = 3) auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) varied with electrode and jawphone location during aerial testing. Stimuli were tone bursts with center frequencies of 28 to 160 kHz. Regression-based thresholds were lowest with the jawphone on the posterior and middle parts of the mandible. Thresholds based on later ABR peaks-recorded using an electrode immediately behind the blowhole-suggested more similarity between the thresholds for the anterior tip of the rostrum and the posterior/middle mandible than those based on earlier monaural waves recorded near the meatus. This was likely a result of a summation of responses from both ears as opposed to a more efficient acoustic pathway to the ear. These patterns were independent of frequency. These findings provide guidance for jawphone and electrode locations when examining dolphin hearing and when interpreting relative acoustic sensitivity of the head in similar testing situations.
ISSN:1520-8524
DOI:10.1121/10.0001123