Three-dimensional microstructural characterization of porous cubic zirconia

•Cubic zirconia sinters were investigated using the 3D-EBSD technique.•Relatively large volumes of nonconductive material were successfully analyzed.•Results of 3D analysis were compared to the conventional 2D results and stereological calculations. A set of cubic zirconia samples were investigated...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMicron (Oxford, England : 1993) Vol. 78; pp. 73 - 78
Main Authors Bobrowski, Piotr, Pędzich, Zbigniew, Faryna, Marek
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.11.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Cubic zirconia sinters were investigated using the 3D-EBSD technique.•Relatively large volumes of nonconductive material were successfully analyzed.•Results of 3D analysis were compared to the conventional 2D results and stereological calculations. A set of cubic zirconia samples were investigated using 3-dimensional electron backscatter diffraction (3D EBSD) to analyze the grain structure, grain boundary networks and pore morphology. 3D EBSD is a variation of conventional EBSD, whereby a focused ion beam (FIB) is used in a dual beam scanning electron microscope (SEM) i.e. FIB–SEM to mill away material and to create ‘serial sections’ through the material being analyzed. Each new surface revealed is subject to an EBSD scan, which continues sequentially until a desired volume of material has been removed. In this manner, many consecutive 2D EBSD scans can be rendered in 3D to gain a greater insight of microstructural features and parameters. The three samples were examined in order to determine the effect of differences in the manufacturing process used for each. For each sample, a volume of ca. 15,000μm3 was studied. The analysis of several microstructure parameters revealed a strong dependence on manufacturing conditions. Subsequently, the results of 3D EBSD analysis were compared to conventional 2D EBSD. Significant differences between the values of microstructure parameters determined by 2D and 3D EBSD were observed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0968-4328
1878-4291
1878-4291
DOI:10.1016/j.micron.2015.07.004