A comparison study on extraction of polysaccharides from Tricholoma matsutake by response surface methodology

•CCPUE method for the extraction of Tricholoma matsutake's polysaccharides was built.•HWE, UCE, EAE, SUPE and CCPUE were compared for extracting TMP.•The TMP yield of CCPUE was higher than that of other methods.•The energy consumption of CCPUE was modest. The Tricholoma matsutake polysaccharide...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCarbohydrate polymers Vol. 102; pp. 419 - 422
Main Authors Yin, Xiulian, You, Qinghong, Su, Xiaoye
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 15.02.2014
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•CCPUE method for the extraction of Tricholoma matsutake's polysaccharides was built.•HWE, UCE, EAE, SUPE and CCPUE were compared for extracting TMP.•The TMP yield of CCPUE was higher than that of other methods.•The energy consumption of CCPUE was modest. The Tricholoma matsutake polysaccharides (TMP) extraction was optimized using counter-current probe ultrasonic extraction (CCPUE) by response surface methodology (RSM). The effect of three factors (liquid–solid ratio, extraction time and pulse duration) on the TMP yield was studied. The results showed that the optimal conditions were liquid–solid ratio (15), extraction time (61min) and pulse duration (6.0s). Under best conditions, the maximum TMP yield was 8.11±0.35%, which was close with the predicted yield value (8.03%). The five methods, hot-water extraction (HWE), enzyme assisted extraction (EAE), ultrasonic clearer extraction (UCE), static probe ultrasonic extraction (SPUE), and CCPUE for extracting TMP by RSM were further compared. The results indicated that CCPUE had the largest yield of TMP with modest energy consumption.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0144-8617
1879-1344
DOI:10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.11.072