Negotiation

•Reviews behavioral negotiation theory and research.•Focuses on empirical studies of two-party negotiations.•Examines factors affecting negotiators’ interests and priorities, strategies and social interactions, and outcomes.•Reviews psychological factors: cognitions, biases, personality, motivation,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOrganizational behavior and human decision processes Vol. 136; pp. 68 - 79
Main Authors Brett, Jeanne, Thompson, Leigh
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Elsevier Inc 01.09.2016
Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Reviews behavioral negotiation theory and research.•Focuses on empirical studies of two-party negotiations.•Examines factors affecting negotiators’ interests and priorities, strategies and social interactions, and outcomes.•Reviews psychological factors: cognitions, biases, personality, motivation, emotions and trust.•Reviews social-environmental factors: reputation, relationship, gender, BATNA, status, and culture.•Discusses future directions for negotiation research. Negotiation has been an important area of research within organizational behavior and management science for the past 50years. In this review, we adapt Brett’s model of culture and negotiation (Brett, 2000) and use it as an organizing guide to examine the factors that research has shown to affect 3 key measures, namely: negotiators’ interests and priorities, strategies and social interactions, and outcomes. Specifically, the model focuses on psychological factors including cognitions and biases, personality, motivation, emotions and inclination to trust; and social-environmental factors including reputation and relationship, gender, power and status, and culture. We conclude with a discussion of how future directions might address some of the limitations of current research.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0749-5978
1095-9920
DOI:10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.06.003