MRI and amino acid PET detection of whole-brain tumor burden

• Published in: Frontiers in oncology Vol. 13; p. 1248249
• Main Authors: Chen, Peng, Scarpelli, Matthew L., Healey, Debbie R., Mehta, Shwetal, Quarles, C. Chad
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Frontiers Media S.A 21.09.2023
• Subjects: amino acid PET; brain tumor; glioblastoma; imaging; MRI; Oncology; tissue clearing
• ISSN: 2234-943X; 2234-943X
• DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1248249

Background [ 18 F]fluciclovine amino acid PET has shown promise for detecting brain tumor regions undetected on conventional anatomic MRI scans. However, it remains unclear which of these modalities provides a better assessment of the whole brain tumor burden. This study quantifies the performance of [ 18 F]fluciclovine PET and MRI for detecting the whole brain tumor burden. Methods Thirteen rats were orthotopically implanted with fluorescently transduced human glioblastoma cells. Rats underwent MRI (T1- and T2-weighted) and [ 18 F]fluciclovine PET. Next brains were excised, optically cleared, and scanned ex vivo with fluorescence imaging. All images were co-registered using a novel landmark-based registration to enable a spatial comparison. The tumor burden identified on the fluorescent images was considered the ground truth for comparison with the in vivo imaging. Results Across all cases, the PET sensitivity for detecting tumor burden (median 0.67) was not significantly different than MRI (combined T1+T2-weighted) sensitivity (median 0.61; p=0.85). However, the combined PET+MRI sensitivity (median 0.86) was significantly higher than MRI alone (41% higher; p=0.004) or PET alone (28% higher; p=0.0002). The specificity of combined PET+MRI (median=0.91) was significantly lower compared with MRI alone (6% lower; p=0.004) or PET alone (2% lower; p=0.002). Conclusion In these glioblastoma xenografts, [ 18 F]fluciclovine PET did not provide a significant increase in tumor burden detection relative to conventional anatomic MRI. However, a combined PET and MRI assessment did significantly improve detection sensitivity relative to either modality alone, suggesting potential value in a combined assessment for some tumors.