Length scales of scalar diffusion in the convective boundary layer : Laboratory observations

A laboratory study of scalar diffusion in the convective boundary layer has found results that are consistent with a 1999 large-eddy simulation (LES) study by Jonker, Duynkerke and Cuijpers. For bottom-up and top-down scalars (introduced as 'infinite' area sources of passive tracer at the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBoundary-layer meteorology Vol. 116; no. 1; pp. 1 - 35
Main Authors VAN DOP, Han, VAN AS, Dirk, VAN HERWIJNEN, Alec, HIBBERD, Mark F, JONKER, Harm
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Dordrecht Springer 01.07.2005
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A laboratory study of scalar diffusion in the convective boundary layer has found results that are consistent with a 1999 large-eddy simulation (LES) study by Jonker, Duynkerke and Cuijpers. For bottom-up and top-down scalars (introduced as 'infinite' area sources of passive tracer at the surface and inversion, respectively) the dominant length scale was found to be much larger than the length scale for density fluctuations, the latter being equal to the boundary-layer depth h. The variance of the normalized passive scalar grew continuously with time and its magnitude was about 3-5 times larger for the top-down case than for the bottom-up case. The vertical profiles of the normalized passive scalar variance were found to be approximately constant through the convective boundary layer (CBL) with a value of about 3-8c* for bottom-up and 10-50c* for top-down diffusion. Finally, there was some evidence of a minimum in the variance and dominant length scale for scalar flux ratios (top-down to bottom-up flux) close to -0.5. All these convection tank results confirm the LES results and support the hypothesis that there is a distinct difference in behaviour between the dynamic and passive variables in the CBL.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0006-8314
1573-1472
DOI:10.1007/s10546-004-2165-1