Systematic review and meta‐analysis of adverse pregnancy outcomes after uterine adenomyosis
Background Studies on the impact of adenomyosis and its pregnancy complications have yielded conflicting results. Objective To determine the likelihood of adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with adenomyosis relative to women without adenomyosis. Search strategy PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of...
Saved in:
Published in | International journal of gynecology and obstetrics Vol. 145; no. 2; pp. 149 - 157 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
01.05.2019
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background
Studies on the impact of adenomyosis and its pregnancy complications have yielded conflicting results.
Objective
To determine the likelihood of adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with adenomyosis relative to women without adenomyosis.
Search strategy
PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for studies published up to June 15, 2018.
Selection criteria
Observational studies with medically confirmed pregnancy outcomes as endpoints.
Data collection and analysis
Two researchers independently screened and selected relevant studies. Dichotomous data for all adverse pregnancy outcomes were expressed as an odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI), and combined in a meta‐analysis by using a random‐effects model.
Main results
Six studies (322 cases and 9420 controls) were eligible for inclusion in the meta‐analysis. Women with adenomyosis had an increased likelihood of preterm birth (OR, 3.05; 95% CI, 2.08–4.47; P˂0.001), small for gestational age (OR, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.71–6.08; P˂0.001), and pre‐eclampsia (OR, 4.35; 95% CI, 1.07–17.72; P=0.042).
Conclusion
Adenomyosis seems to have a detrimental impact on pregnancy outcomes, resulting in a higher likelihood of preterm birth, small for gestational age, and pre‐eclampsia.
Adenomyosis was found to increase the likelihood of adverse pregnancy outcomes. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 0020-7292 1879-3479 |
DOI: | 10.1002/ijgo.12799 |