Comparison of maximal Rubidium-82 activities for myocardial blood flow quantification between digital and conventional PET systems

PET-based myocardial blood flow (MBF) quantification can be inaccurate when using high tracer activities. Our aim was to derive the maximal Rubidium-82 activity for MBF assessment using a new digital PET system and compare the results with conventional analog systems. 1.8 GBq Rubidium-82 was injecte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of nuclear cardiology Vol. 26; no. 4; pp. 1286 - 1291
Main Authors van Dijk, Joris D., Jager, Pieter L., van Osch, Jochen A.C., Khodaverdi, Maryam, van Dalen, Jorn A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cham Elsevier Inc 01.08.2019
Springer International Publishing
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:PET-based myocardial blood flow (MBF) quantification can be inaccurate when using high tracer activities. Our aim was to derive the maximal Rubidium-82 activity for MBF assessment using a new digital PET system and compare the results with conventional analog systems. 1.8 GBq Rubidium-82 was injected into the cardiac insert of an anthropomorphic torso phantom. Data were acquired for 10 min using an Ingenuity TF (Philips Healthcare), Discovery 690 (D690, GE Healthcare), and digital PET prototype system (Philips Healthcare). The dynamic ranges, defined as the maximal measured activity in the reconstructed images deviating < 10% from the true present activity, were determined in all scans. The dynamic ranges were 312 MBq for Ingenuity TF, 650 MBq for D690, and 654 MBq for digital PET prototype. The maximal Rb-82 activity for MBF assessment using digital PET prototype is higher than that for its analog counterpart (Ingenuity TF), but seems comparable to the D690.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1071-3581
1532-6551
1532-6551
DOI:10.1007/s12350-017-1156-9