Impact modification of PA-6 and PBT by epoxy-functionalized rubbers
Glycidylmethacrylate (GMA) grafted apolar (ethylene/propylene/diene ‐ EPDM) and polar (acrylonitrile/butadiene ‐ NBR) rubbers were melt blended with polyamide‐6 (PA‐6) and polybutylene terephthalate (PBT). The toughness of the blends containing 5, 10 and 50 wt.% epoxy functionalized rubbers was asse...
Saved in:
Published in | Macromolecular symposia. Vol. 202; no. 1; pp. 59 - 66 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Weinheim
WILEY-VCH Verlag
01.10.2003
WILEY‐VCH Verlag |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Glycidylmethacrylate (GMA) grafted apolar (ethylene/propylene/diene ‐ EPDM) and polar (acrylonitrile/butadiene ‐ NBR) rubbers were melt blended with polyamide‐6 (PA‐6) and polybutylene terephthalate (PBT). The toughness of the blends containing 5, 10 and 50 wt.% epoxy functionalized rubbers was assessed by various methods (notched Charpy, perforation impact) as a function of temperature (T=23 and −40°C). The notched Charpy tests served to deduce the fracture toughness (Kc) and energy (Gc) data. It was established that EPDM‐g‐GMA is a slightly better impact modifier than is NBR‐g‐GMA albeit the latter polar rubber is more compatible with both matrices than the less polar EPDM‐g‐GMA. This finding was traced to the difference in the glass transition temperature (Tg of NBR is higher than that of EPDM) and to the dispersion of the epoxy functionalized rubbers. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:3CD96B04FE81DFF37F383B62B9BA90C1AE06B6A6 ArticleID:MASY200351206 ark:/67375/WNG-43B67R1M-6 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1022-1360 1521-3900 |
DOI: | 10.1002/masy.200351206 |