A Validation Study of the Need for Affect Questionnaire-Short Form in Legal Contexts

• Published in: Journal of personality assessment Vol. 99; no. 1; pp. 67 - 77
• Main Authors: Cramer, Robert J., Wevodau, Amy L., Gardner, Brett O., Bryson, Claire N.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Routledge 01.01.2017; Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
• Subjects: Agreeableness; Approach-Avoidance; Approaches; Avoidance behavior; Court decisions; Crime; Crime - psychology; Crime Victims; Criminal law; Criminal Law - standards; Criminal sentences; Decision Making; Emotions; Female; Hate; Hate crimes; Humans; Judgment; Juries; Male; Psychometrics; Punishment - psychology; Quantitative psychology; Questionnaires; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards; Undergraduate students; Validation studies; Validity; Violence; Young Adult
• ISSN: 0022-3891; 1532-7752
• DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2016.1205076

We evaluated the psychometric properties of scores on the Need for Affect-Short Form (NAQ-S) in 3 samples: undergraduate students (Sample I), jury-eligible community members (Sample II), and forensic clinicians (Sample III). Concerning factor structure, the NAQ-S 2-factor structure displayed good fit to the data in Sample I, with mostly acceptable levels of internal consistency for both approach and avoidance scores. Construct validity patterns were observed such that approach scores were most strongly correlated with female gender and trait agreeableness scores, whereas avoidance scores were most strongly correlated to trait agreeableness scores. Criterion validity associations emerged in that approach scores displayed main effects on mock juror judgments in hate crimes, and forensic clinician judgments of violence risk estimation. Finally, avoidance scores displayed moderating effects on recommended sentencing length by hate crime victim type. Implications are discussed for emotion in legal decision making and future research.