Within-session patterns of responding with changes in the variability and probability of food delivery
The present study was an attempt to determine the factors to which subjects sensitize and/or habituate within experimental sessions. Rats pressed a lever and pigeons pecked a key for food reinforcers delivered during a 60 min session. In experiment 1, subjects initially responded on a simple variabl...
Saved in:
Published in | Behavioural processes Vol. 39; no. 3; pp. 279 - 289 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Netherlands
Elsevier B.V
01.02.1997
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0376-6357 1872-8308 |
DOI | 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0 |
Cover
Abstract | The present study was an attempt to determine the factors to which subjects sensitize and/or habituate within experimental sessions. Rats pressed a lever and pigeons pecked a key for food reinforcers delivered during a 60 min session. In experiment 1, subjects initially responded on a simple variable-interval 30 s schedule that consisted of 25 intervals. In subsequent conditions, the number of intervals in the series was decreased until subjects responded on a simple fixed-interval 30 s schedule. In experiment 2, subjects always responded on a variable-interval 15 s schedule that resulted in a stimulus change. The probability that a food reinforcer would accompany the stimulus change varied across conditions. Results showed that within-session patterns of responding did not change for either species with changes in the temporal pattern of reinforcer delivery (experiment 1). The within-session response patterns generally became flatter with decreases in the probability of food delivery for both species (experiment 2). The present results indicate that subjects are sensitizing and/or habituating to the reinforcer itself and/or to some aspect of its delivery. They also help to highlight the strength of sensitization-habituation as an explanation for within-session changes in responding. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The present study was an attempt to determine the factors to which subjects sensitize and/or habituate within experimental sessions. Rats pressed a lever and pigeons pecked a key for food reinforcers delivered during a 60 min session. In experiment 1, subjects initially responded on a simple variable-interval 30 s schedule that consisted of 25 intervals. In subsequent conditions, the number of intervals in the series was decreased until subjects responded on a simple fixed-interval 30 s schedule. In experiment 2, subjects always responded on a variable-interval 15 s schedule that resulted in a stimulus change. The probability that a food reinforcer would accompany the stimulus change varied across conditions. Results showed that within-session patterns of responding did not change for either species with changes in the temporal pattern of reinforcer delivery (experiment 1). The within-session response patterns generally became flatter with decreases in the probability of food delivery for both species (experiment 2). The present results indicate that subjects are sensitizing and/or habituating to the reinforcer itself and/or to some aspect of its delivery. They also help to highlight the strength of sensitization-habituation as an explanation for within-session changes in responding.The present study was an attempt to determine the factors to which subjects sensitize and/or habituate within experimental sessions. Rats pressed a lever and pigeons pecked a key for food reinforcers delivered during a 60 min session. In experiment 1, subjects initially responded on a simple variable-interval 30 s schedule that consisted of 25 intervals. In subsequent conditions, the number of intervals in the series was decreased until subjects responded on a simple fixed-interval 30 s schedule. In experiment 2, subjects always responded on a variable-interval 15 s schedule that resulted in a stimulus change. The probability that a food reinforcer would accompany the stimulus change varied across conditions. Results showed that within-session patterns of responding did not change for either species with changes in the temporal pattern of reinforcer delivery (experiment 1). The within-session response patterns generally became flatter with decreases in the probability of food delivery for both species (experiment 2). The present results indicate that subjects are sensitizing and/or habituating to the reinforcer itself and/or to some aspect of its delivery. They also help to highlight the strength of sensitization-habituation as an explanation for within-session changes in responding. The present study was an attempt to determine the factors to which subjects sensitize and/or habituate within experimental sessions. Rats pressed a lever and pigeons pecked a key for food reinforcers delivered during a 60 min session. In experiment 1, subjects initially responded on a simple variable-interval 30 s schedule that consisted of 25 intervals. In subsequent conditions, the number of intervals in the series was decreased until subjects responded on a simple fixed-interval 30 s schedule. In experiment 2, subjects always responded on a variable-interval 15 s schedule that resulted in a stimulus change. The probability that a food reinforcer would accompany the stimulus change varied across conditions. Results showed that within-session patterns of responding did not change for either species with changes in the temporal pattern of reinforcer delivery (experiment 1). The within-session response patterns generally became flatter with decreases in the probability of food delivery for both species (experiment 2). The present results indicate that subjects are sensitizing and/or habituating to the reinforcer itself and/or to some aspect of its delivery. They also help to highlight the strength of sensitization-habituation as an explanation for within-session changes in responding. |
Author | Weatherly, Jeffrey N Swindell, Samantha McSweeney, Frances K |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Jeffrey N surname: Weatherly fullname: Weatherly, Jeffrey N – sequence: 2 givenname: Frances K surname: McSweeney fullname: McSweeney, Frances K – sequence: 3 givenname: Samantha surname: Swindell fullname: Swindell, Samantha |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24897335$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkc1qGzEUhUVJaJy0j9CiVUkW00jW79BFKSH9gUAWaelSaKSrWGUsuZLs4rfvOI676MYrceH77hXnnKOTlBMg9IaS95RQef1AmJKdZEJd9vKKECX6jrxAM6rVvNOM6BM0-4ecofNafxFCqCbyJTqbc90rxsQMhZ-xLWLqKtQac8Ir2xqUVHEOuEBd5eRjesR_Jgq7hU2PUHFMuC0Ab2yJdohjbFtsk8erkofDPNkhZ489jHEDZfsKnQY7Vnj9_F6gH59vv9987e7uv3y7-XTXOdbz1gXHwqCklcoqUEJp0Cx4kIRrTsFZ0NJSKoXWzIu54GIIAIMAsNxLIJxdoHf7vdNnfq-hNrOM1cE42gR5XQ0VvWCS78DLIyDjpJeK0gl9-4yuhyV4sypxacvWHEKcgA97wJVca4FgXGy2TXG2YuNoKDG7ysxTZWbXh-mlearMkMkW_9mHA8e8j3sPpjw3EYqpLkJy4GMB14zP8ciGv9Axr1M |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3758_BF03199221 crossref_primary_10_1901_jeab_2000_74_347 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0376_6357_99_00046_7 crossref_primary_10_3200_GENP_131_1_5_17 |
Cites_doi | 10.1037/0735-7044.108.6.1019 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-529 10.1016/0376-6357(95)00016-X 10.3758/BF03200413 10.1901/jeab.1995.64-405 10.1016/S0023-9690(05)80005-0 10.1016/0376-6357(95)00009-J 10.1016/B978-0-12-549801-2.50011-4 10.1016/0376-6357(96)00024-1 10.1037/0033-2909.120.2.256 10.1016/0023-9690(95)90018-7 10.1016/0376-6357(94)90007-8 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-621 10.1016/0376-6357(91)90092-E 10.1901/jeab.1994.62-109 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-19 10.1037/h0029472 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 1997 Elsevier Science B.V. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 1997 Elsevier Science B.V. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 7QG |
DOI | 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic Animal Behavior Abstracts |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic Animal Behavior Abstracts |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic Animal Behavior Abstracts PubMed |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Zoology |
EISSN | 1872-8308 |
EndPage | 289 |
ExternalDocumentID | 24897335 10_1016_S0376_6357_96_00759_0 S0376635796007590 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M .~1 0R~ 1B1 1RT 1~. 1~5 23N 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5VS 6J9 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JM AABVA AACTN AADPK AAEDT AAEDW AAIAV AAIKJ AAKOC AALCJ AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQXK AATLK AAXLA AAXUO ABBQC ABCQJ ABFNM ABFRF ABGRD ABIVO ABJNI ABKYH ABLVK ABMAC ABMZM ABRWV ABXDB ABYKQ ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACHQT ACIUM ACNCT ACPRK ACRLP ADBBV ADEZE ADMUD ADQTV AEBSH AEFWE AEKER AENEX AEQOU AESVU AEXOQ AFKWA AFTJW AFXIZ AGHFR AGUBO AGWIK AGYEJ AHHHB AI. AIEXJ AIKHN AITUG AJBFU AJOXV AJRQY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ ANZVX ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV CBWCG CS3 D0S DU5 EBS EFJIC EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-2 G-Q GBLVA HLV HMQ HMW HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W KOM LCYCR LW9 M2V M3V M41 MO0 MOBAO MVM N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 QYZTP R2- RIG ROL RPZ SAB SCC SDF SDG SDP SES SEW SNL SNS SPCBC SPS SSA SSH SSN SSZ T5K TWZ UNMZH VH1 VQA WH7 WUQ YR2 ~02 ~G- AAHBH AATTM AAXKI AAYWO AAYXX ABWVN ACIEU ACMHX ACRPL ACVFH ADCNI ADNMO ADSLC AEIPS AEUPX AFJKZ AFPUW AGCQF AGQPQ AGRNS AGWPP AIGII AIIUN AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ANKPU APXCP CITATION EFKBS NPM 7X8 7QG |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-fc3fb76a67a7e7578e83fde604841ecae86a1165883d52545bfeeb5eea4d6e043 |
IEDL.DBID | AIKHN |
ISSN | 0376-6357 |
IngestDate | Fri Sep 05 01:18:30 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 08:34:15 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:01:18 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:00:33 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:57:20 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:34:31 EST 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Keywords | Sensitization Rat Pigeon Reinforcement probability Interval schedule Habituation |
Language | English |
License | https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c394t-fc3fb76a67a7e7578e83fde604841ecae86a1165883d52545bfeeb5eea4d6e043 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
PMID | 24897335 |
PQID | 1534096711 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 11 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_15953644 proquest_miscellaneous_1534096711 pubmed_primary_24897335 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_S0376_6357_96_00759_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0376_6357_96_00759_0 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_S0376_6357_96_00759_0 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 1900 |
PublicationDate | 1997-02-00 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 1997-02-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 1997 text: 1997-02-00 |
PublicationDecade | 1990 |
PublicationPlace | Netherlands |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Netherlands |
PublicationTitle | Behavioural processes |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Behav Processes |
PublicationYear | 1997 |
Publisher | Elsevier B.V |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier B.V |
References | Roll, J.M., McSweeney, F.K., Johnson, K.S. and Weatherly, J.N., 1995. Satiety contributes little to within-session decreases in responding. Learn. Motiv., 26: 323–341. McSweeney, F.K., Roll, J.M. and Weatherly, J.N., 1994. Within–session changes in responding during several simple schedules. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 62: 109–132. Weatherly, J.N., McSweeney, F.K. and Swindell, S., 1995. On the contributions of responding and reinforcement to within-session patterns of responding. Learn. Motiv., 26: 421–432. McSweeney, F.K., Hatfield, J. and Allen, T.M., 1990. Within-session responding as a function of post-session feedings. Behav. Process., 22: 177–186. McSweeney, F.K., Weatherly, J.N. and Swindell, S., 1996b. Within-session changes in responding during variable interval schedules. Behav. Process., 36: 67–76. Behav. Neurosci., 108: 1019–1029. Melville, C.L. and Weatherly, J.N., 1996. Within-session patterns of responding when rats run in a T-maze. Behav. Process., 38: 89–102. Cannon, C.B. and McSweeney, F.K., 1996. Within-session changes in responding when rate and duration of reinforcement vary. Behav. Process., 34: 285–292. McSweeney, F.K. and Roll, J.M., 1993. Responding changes systematically within sessions during conditioning procedures. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 60: 621–640. McSweeney, F.K., 1992. Rate of reinforcement and session duration as determinants for within-session patterns of responding. Anim. Learn. Behav., 20: 160–169. Broster, B.S. and Rankin, C.H., 1994. Effects of changing interstimulus interval during habituation in McSweeney, F.K. and Hinson, J.M., 1992. Patterns of responding within sessions. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 58: 19–36. McSweeney, F.K. and Johnson, K.S., 1994. The effect of time between sessions on within-session patterns of responding. Behav. Process., 31: 207–218. Fleshler, M. and Hoffman, H.S., 1962. A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 5: 529–530. Killeen, P.R., 1995. Economics, ecologics, and mechanics: the dynamics of responding under conditions of varying motivation. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 64: 405–431. Davis, M., 1970. Effects of interstimulus interval length and variability on startle-response habituation in the rat. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 72: 177–192. Graham, F.K., 1973. Habituation and dishabituation of responses innervated by the autonomic nervous system. In: H.V.S. Peeke and M.J. Herz (Editors), Habituation. Vol. 1: Behavioral Studies, Academic Press, New York, pp. 163–218. McSweeney, F.K., Hinson, J.M. and Cannon, C.B., 1996a. Sensitization–habituation occurs during operant conditioning procedures. Psych. Bull., 120: 256–271. 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB1 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB2 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB16 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB17 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB7 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB10 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB8 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB11 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB9 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB3 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB14 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB4 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB15 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB5 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB12 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB6 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB13 |
References_xml | – reference: McSweeney, F.K. and Johnson, K.S., 1994. The effect of time between sessions on within-session patterns of responding. Behav. Process., 31: 207–218. – reference: McSweeney, F.K., Hinson, J.M. and Cannon, C.B., 1996a. Sensitization–habituation occurs during operant conditioning procedures. Psych. Bull., 120: 256–271. – reference: Melville, C.L. and Weatherly, J.N., 1996. Within-session patterns of responding when rats run in a T-maze. Behav. Process., 38: 89–102. – reference: . Behav. Neurosci., 108: 1019–1029. – reference: McSweeney, F.K., Roll, J.M. and Weatherly, J.N., 1994. Within–session changes in responding during several simple schedules. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 62: 109–132. – reference: Davis, M., 1970. Effects of interstimulus interval length and variability on startle-response habituation in the rat. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 72: 177–192. – reference: McSweeney, F.K. and Hinson, J.M., 1992. Patterns of responding within sessions. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 58: 19–36. – reference: Fleshler, M. and Hoffman, H.S., 1962. A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 5: 529–530. – reference: McSweeney, F.K., 1992. Rate of reinforcement and session duration as determinants for within-session patterns of responding. Anim. Learn. Behav., 20: 160–169. – reference: Graham, F.K., 1973. Habituation and dishabituation of responses innervated by the autonomic nervous system. In: H.V.S. Peeke and M.J. Herz (Editors), Habituation. Vol. 1: Behavioral Studies, Academic Press, New York, pp. 163–218. – reference: McSweeney, F.K., Weatherly, J.N. and Swindell, S., 1996b. Within-session changes in responding during variable interval schedules. Behav. Process., 36: 67–76. – reference: Roll, J.M., McSweeney, F.K., Johnson, K.S. and Weatherly, J.N., 1995. Satiety contributes little to within-session decreases in responding. Learn. Motiv., 26: 323–341. – reference: Broster, B.S. and Rankin, C.H., 1994. Effects of changing interstimulus interval during habituation in – reference: Cannon, C.B. and McSweeney, F.K., 1996. Within-session changes in responding when rate and duration of reinforcement vary. Behav. Process., 34: 285–292. – reference: McSweeney, F.K., Hatfield, J. and Allen, T.M., 1990. Within-session responding as a function of post-session feedings. Behav. Process., 22: 177–186. – reference: McSweeney, F.K. and Roll, J.M., 1993. Responding changes systematically within sessions during conditioning procedures. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 60: 621–640. – reference: Weatherly, J.N., McSweeney, F.K. and Swindell, S., 1995. On the contributions of responding and reinforcement to within-session patterns of responding. Learn. Motiv., 26: 421–432. – reference: Killeen, P.R., 1995. Economics, ecologics, and mechanics: the dynamics of responding under conditions of varying motivation. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 64: 405–431. – ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB1 doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.108.6.1019 – ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB4 doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-529 – ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB14 doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(95)00016-X – ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB7 doi: 10.3758/BF03200413 – ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB6 doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.64-405 – ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB17 doi: 10.1016/S0023-9690(05)80005-0 – ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB2 doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(95)00009-J – ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB5 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-549801-2.50011-4 – ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB15 doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(96)00024-1 – ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB10 doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.120.2.256 – ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB16 doi: 10.1016/0023-9690(95)90018-7 – ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB11 doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(94)90007-8 – ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB12 doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-621 – ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB8 doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(91)90092-E – ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB13 doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.62-109 – ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB9 doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-19 – ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB3 doi: 10.1037/h0029472 |
SSID | ssj0001806 |
Score | 1.4848294 |
Snippet | The present study was an attempt to determine the factors to which subjects sensitize and/or habituate within experimental sessions. Rats pressed a lever and... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 279 |
SubjectTerms | Habituation Interval schedule Pigeon Rat Reinforcement probability Sensitization |
Title | Within-session patterns of responding with changes in the variability and probability of food delivery |
URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24897335 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1534096711 https://www.proquest.com/docview/15953644 |
Volume | 39 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEBbphkIvpekrm7ZbFXpoD8ra0cP2MSwJ21cobUNDL0K2RtQQ7CW7CeTS394Zy96QwxLI0cIjhtFoHtLoG8beYxBRBlM5EdKkFCpkTpSpLAUtuJGhzH0HpP3txMxP1eczfbbFZsNbGCqr7G1_tOmdte5Hpr00p4u6nv5McG8QmlpBEOu6wLx9-0AWRo_Y9uGnL_OTtUFO8yReWWZGEMHNQ544STf4oTAfu3lEsslFbQpBO1d0_IQ97mNIfhjZ3GFb0DxlD_-03Qn5MxZ-16u_dSOWEXKDLzoIzWbJ28AvupJY8lecTmB5fPe75HXDMRLkV5g5R-Dua-4az6ndzPCN1KFtPfdwTrUc18_Z6fHRr9lc9O0URCULtRKhQtlnxpnMZUAw9pDL4MHgHlYpVA5y4wiMJ8-l15g36jIAlBrAKW8gUfIFGzVtA7uMK-VA--BkBZkizLK0BO0qj8GlCqDNmKlBgrbqscap5cW5vSkqQ8FbErwtqLAOBW-TMdtfky0i2MZdBPmwPPaW1lh0CHeRvhuW0-KOomsS10B7ubToAzDpNVmajtnbjf_QtbdSY_YyasKa3wOVF5mUeu_-rL1ijyJILhXNvGaj1cUlvMHQZ1VO2IP9f-kEFXz24-v3Sa_o_wEukv_u |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEB7ChtJeSt_dvqJCD-1BXbt62D6G0LBpkr00oaEXIVkjYgj2kt0U8u-rsewNPSyBHi08QsxoXprRJ4BPMYhwQdeWhzxzXIbCcpcLx0ngWgRX-h5I-3Sh5-fyx4W62IGD8S4MtVUOtj_Z9N5aDyOzgZuzZdPMfmZRNwhNrSKIdVXFvH1XqpjtTWB3_-h4vtgY5LzMUsmy0JwI7i7ypEn6wc-V_tLPw7NtLmpbCNq7osMn8HiIIdl-WuZT2MH2GTz43fUn5M8h_GrWl03LVwlygy17CM12xbrArvuWWPJXjE5gWbr3u2JNy2IkyP7EzDkBd98y23pGz82M35E6dJ1nHq-ol-P2BZwffj87mPPhOQVei0queagj7wttdWELJBh7LEXwqKMOyxxri6W2BMZTlsKrmDcqFxCdQrTSa8ykeAmTtmvxNTApLSofrKixkIRZljtUtvYxuJQBlZ6CHDlo6gFrnJ68uDJ3TWWR8YYYbypqrIuMN9kUvm7Ilgls4z6CchSP-WfXmOgQ7iP9OIrTRI2iMoltsbtZmegDYtKrizyfwt7Wf6jsLeUUXqWdsFnvN1lWhRDqzf8vbQ8ezs9OT8zJ0eL4LTxKgLnUQPMOJuvrG3wfw6C1-zBs879NWABX |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Within-session+patterns+of+responding+with+changes+in+the+variability+and+probability+of+food+delivery&rft.jtitle=Behavioural+processes&rft.au=Weatherly%2C+J+N&rft.au=McSweeney%2C+F+K&rft.au=Swindell%2C+S&rft.date=1997-02-01&rft.issn=0376-6357&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=289&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2FS0376-6357%2896%2900759-0&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0376-6357&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0376-6357&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0376-6357&client=summon |