Within-session patterns of responding with changes in the variability and probability of food delivery

The present study was an attempt to determine the factors to which subjects sensitize and/or habituate within experimental sessions. Rats pressed a lever and pigeons pecked a key for food reinforcers delivered during a 60 min session. In experiment 1, subjects initially responded on a simple variabl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBehavioural processes Vol. 39; no. 3; pp. 279 - 289
Main Authors Weatherly, Jeffrey N, McSweeney, Frances K, Swindell, Samantha
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.02.1997
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0376-6357
1872-8308
DOI10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0

Cover

Abstract The present study was an attempt to determine the factors to which subjects sensitize and/or habituate within experimental sessions. Rats pressed a lever and pigeons pecked a key for food reinforcers delivered during a 60 min session. In experiment 1, subjects initially responded on a simple variable-interval 30 s schedule that consisted of 25 intervals. In subsequent conditions, the number of intervals in the series was decreased until subjects responded on a simple fixed-interval 30 s schedule. In experiment 2, subjects always responded on a variable-interval 15 s schedule that resulted in a stimulus change. The probability that a food reinforcer would accompany the stimulus change varied across conditions. Results showed that within-session patterns of responding did not change for either species with changes in the temporal pattern of reinforcer delivery (experiment 1). The within-session response patterns generally became flatter with decreases in the probability of food delivery for both species (experiment 2). The present results indicate that subjects are sensitizing and/or habituating to the reinforcer itself and/or to some aspect of its delivery. They also help to highlight the strength of sensitization-habituation as an explanation for within-session changes in responding.
AbstractList The present study was an attempt to determine the factors to which subjects sensitize and/or habituate within experimental sessions. Rats pressed a lever and pigeons pecked a key for food reinforcers delivered during a 60 min session. In experiment 1, subjects initially responded on a simple variable-interval 30 s schedule that consisted of 25 intervals. In subsequent conditions, the number of intervals in the series was decreased until subjects responded on a simple fixed-interval 30 s schedule. In experiment 2, subjects always responded on a variable-interval 15 s schedule that resulted in a stimulus change. The probability that a food reinforcer would accompany the stimulus change varied across conditions. Results showed that within-session patterns of responding did not change for either species with changes in the temporal pattern of reinforcer delivery (experiment 1). The within-session response patterns generally became flatter with decreases in the probability of food delivery for both species (experiment 2). The present results indicate that subjects are sensitizing and/or habituating to the reinforcer itself and/or to some aspect of its delivery. They also help to highlight the strength of sensitization-habituation as an explanation for within-session changes in responding.The present study was an attempt to determine the factors to which subjects sensitize and/or habituate within experimental sessions. Rats pressed a lever and pigeons pecked a key for food reinforcers delivered during a 60 min session. In experiment 1, subjects initially responded on a simple variable-interval 30 s schedule that consisted of 25 intervals. In subsequent conditions, the number of intervals in the series was decreased until subjects responded on a simple fixed-interval 30 s schedule. In experiment 2, subjects always responded on a variable-interval 15 s schedule that resulted in a stimulus change. The probability that a food reinforcer would accompany the stimulus change varied across conditions. Results showed that within-session patterns of responding did not change for either species with changes in the temporal pattern of reinforcer delivery (experiment 1). The within-session response patterns generally became flatter with decreases in the probability of food delivery for both species (experiment 2). The present results indicate that subjects are sensitizing and/or habituating to the reinforcer itself and/or to some aspect of its delivery. They also help to highlight the strength of sensitization-habituation as an explanation for within-session changes in responding.
The present study was an attempt to determine the factors to which subjects sensitize and/or habituate within experimental sessions. Rats pressed a lever and pigeons pecked a key for food reinforcers delivered during a 60 min session. In experiment 1, subjects initially responded on a simple variable-interval 30 s schedule that consisted of 25 intervals. In subsequent conditions, the number of intervals in the series was decreased until subjects responded on a simple fixed-interval 30 s schedule. In experiment 2, subjects always responded on a variable-interval 15 s schedule that resulted in a stimulus change. The probability that a food reinforcer would accompany the stimulus change varied across conditions. Results showed that within-session patterns of responding did not change for either species with changes in the temporal pattern of reinforcer delivery (experiment 1). The within-session response patterns generally became flatter with decreases in the probability of food delivery for both species (experiment 2). The present results indicate that subjects are sensitizing and/or habituating to the reinforcer itself and/or to some aspect of its delivery. They also help to highlight the strength of sensitization-habituation as an explanation for within-session changes in responding.
Author Weatherly, Jeffrey N
Swindell, Samantha
McSweeney, Frances K
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Jeffrey N
  surname: Weatherly
  fullname: Weatherly, Jeffrey N
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Frances K
  surname: McSweeney
  fullname: McSweeney, Frances K
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Samantha
  surname: Swindell
  fullname: Swindell, Samantha
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24897335$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkc1qGzEUhUVJaJy0j9CiVUkW00jW79BFKSH9gUAWaelSaKSrWGUsuZLs4rfvOI676MYrceH77hXnnKOTlBMg9IaS95RQef1AmJKdZEJd9vKKECX6jrxAM6rVvNOM6BM0-4ecofNafxFCqCbyJTqbc90rxsQMhZ-xLWLqKtQac8Ir2xqUVHEOuEBd5eRjesR_Jgq7hU2PUHFMuC0Ab2yJdohjbFtsk8erkofDPNkhZ489jHEDZfsKnQY7Vnj9_F6gH59vv9987e7uv3y7-XTXOdbz1gXHwqCklcoqUEJp0Cx4kIRrTsFZ0NJSKoXWzIu54GIIAIMAsNxLIJxdoHf7vdNnfq-hNrOM1cE42gR5XQ0VvWCS78DLIyDjpJeK0gl9-4yuhyV4sypxacvWHEKcgA97wJVca4FgXGy2TXG2YuNoKDG7ysxTZWbXh-mlearMkMkW_9mHA8e8j3sPpjw3EYqpLkJy4GMB14zP8ciGv9Axr1M
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3758_BF03199221
crossref_primary_10_1901_jeab_2000_74_347
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0376_6357_99_00046_7
crossref_primary_10_3200_GENP_131_1_5_17
Cites_doi 10.1037/0735-7044.108.6.1019
10.1901/jeab.1962.5-529
10.1016/0376-6357(95)00016-X
10.3758/BF03200413
10.1901/jeab.1995.64-405
10.1016/S0023-9690(05)80005-0
10.1016/0376-6357(95)00009-J
10.1016/B978-0-12-549801-2.50011-4
10.1016/0376-6357(96)00024-1
10.1037/0033-2909.120.2.256
10.1016/0023-9690(95)90018-7
10.1016/0376-6357(94)90007-8
10.1901/jeab.1993.60-621
10.1016/0376-6357(91)90092-E
10.1901/jeab.1994.62-109
10.1901/jeab.1992.58-19
10.1037/h0029472
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.
Copyright_xml – notice: 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
7QG
DOI 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
Animal Behavior Abstracts
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
Animal Behavior Abstracts
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
Animal Behavior Abstracts
PubMed

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Zoology
EISSN 1872-8308
EndPage 289
ExternalDocumentID 24897335
10_1016_S0376_6357_96_00759_0
S0376635796007590
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.~1
0R~
1B1
1RT
1~.
1~5
23N
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5VS
6J9
7-5
71M
8P~
9JM
AABVA
AACTN
AADPK
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIAV
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALCJ
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQXK
AATLK
AAXLA
AAXUO
ABBQC
ABCQJ
ABFNM
ABFRF
ABGRD
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABKYH
ABLVK
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABRWV
ABXDB
ABYKQ
ACDAQ
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACIUM
ACNCT
ACPRK
ACRLP
ADBBV
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADQTV
AEBSH
AEFWE
AEKER
AENEX
AEQOU
AESVU
AEXOQ
AFKWA
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGHFR
AGUBO
AGWIK
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AI.
AIEXJ
AIKHN
AITUG
AJBFU
AJOXV
AJRQY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMFUW
AMRAJ
ANZVX
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
CBWCG
CS3
D0S
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EFLBG
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
HLV
HMQ
HMW
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
KOM
LCYCR
LW9
M2V
M3V
M41
MO0
MOBAO
MVM
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
Q38
QYZTP
R2-
RIG
ROL
RPZ
SAB
SCC
SDF
SDG
SDP
SES
SEW
SNL
SNS
SPCBC
SPS
SSA
SSH
SSN
SSZ
T5K
TWZ
UNMZH
VH1
VQA
WH7
WUQ
YR2
~02
~G-
AAHBH
AATTM
AAXKI
AAYWO
AAYXX
ABWVN
ACIEU
ACMHX
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADCNI
ADNMO
ADSLC
AEIPS
AEUPX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AGCQF
AGQPQ
AGRNS
AGWPP
AIGII
AIIUN
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ANKPU
APXCP
CITATION
EFKBS
NPM
7X8
7QG
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-fc3fb76a67a7e7578e83fde604841ecae86a1165883d52545bfeeb5eea4d6e043
IEDL.DBID AIKHN
ISSN 0376-6357
IngestDate Fri Sep 05 01:18:30 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 08:34:15 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:01:18 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:00:33 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:57:20 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:34:31 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords Sensitization
Rat
Pigeon
Reinforcement probability
Interval schedule
Habituation
Language English
License https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c394t-fc3fb76a67a7e7578e83fde604841ecae86a1165883d52545bfeeb5eea4d6e043
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
PMID 24897335
PQID 1534096711
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 11
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_15953644
proquest_miscellaneous_1534096711
pubmed_primary_24897335
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_S0376_6357_96_00759_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0376_6357_96_00759_0
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_S0376_6357_96_00759_0
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 1900
PublicationDate 1997-02-00
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 1997-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 1997
  text: 1997-02-00
PublicationDecade 1990
PublicationPlace Netherlands
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Netherlands
PublicationTitle Behavioural processes
PublicationTitleAlternate Behav Processes
PublicationYear 1997
Publisher Elsevier B.V
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier B.V
References Roll, J.M., McSweeney, F.K., Johnson, K.S. and Weatherly, J.N., 1995. Satiety contributes little to within-session decreases in responding. Learn. Motiv., 26: 323–341.
McSweeney, F.K., Roll, J.M. and Weatherly, J.N., 1994. Within–session changes in responding during several simple schedules. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 62: 109–132.
Weatherly, J.N., McSweeney, F.K. and Swindell, S., 1995. On the contributions of responding and reinforcement to within-session patterns of responding. Learn. Motiv., 26: 421–432.
McSweeney, F.K., Hatfield, J. and Allen, T.M., 1990. Within-session responding as a function of post-session feedings. Behav. Process., 22: 177–186.
McSweeney, F.K., Weatherly, J.N. and Swindell, S., 1996b. Within-session changes in responding during variable interval schedules. Behav. Process., 36: 67–76.
Behav. Neurosci., 108: 1019–1029.
Melville, C.L. and Weatherly, J.N., 1996. Within-session patterns of responding when rats run in a T-maze. Behav. Process., 38: 89–102.
Cannon, C.B. and McSweeney, F.K., 1996. Within-session changes in responding when rate and duration of reinforcement vary. Behav. Process., 34: 285–292.
McSweeney, F.K. and Roll, J.M., 1993. Responding changes systematically within sessions during conditioning procedures. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 60: 621–640.
McSweeney, F.K., 1992. Rate of reinforcement and session duration as determinants for within-session patterns of responding. Anim. Learn. Behav., 20: 160–169.
Broster, B.S. and Rankin, C.H., 1994. Effects of changing interstimulus interval during habituation in
McSweeney, F.K. and Hinson, J.M., 1992. Patterns of responding within sessions. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 58: 19–36.
McSweeney, F.K. and Johnson, K.S., 1994. The effect of time between sessions on within-session patterns of responding. Behav. Process., 31: 207–218.
Fleshler, M. and Hoffman, H.S., 1962. A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 5: 529–530.
Killeen, P.R., 1995. Economics, ecologics, and mechanics: the dynamics of responding under conditions of varying motivation. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 64: 405–431.
Davis, M., 1970. Effects of interstimulus interval length and variability on startle-response habituation in the rat. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 72: 177–192.
Graham, F.K., 1973. Habituation and dishabituation of responses innervated by the autonomic nervous system. In: H.V.S. Peeke and M.J. Herz (Editors), Habituation. Vol. 1: Behavioral Studies, Academic Press, New York, pp. 163–218.
McSweeney, F.K., Hinson, J.M. and Cannon, C.B., 1996a. Sensitization–habituation occurs during operant conditioning procedures. Psych. Bull., 120: 256–271.
10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB1
10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB2
10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB16
10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB17
10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB7
10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB10
10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB8
10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB11
10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB9
10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB3
10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB14
10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB4
10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB15
10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB5
10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB12
10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB6
10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB13
References_xml – reference: McSweeney, F.K. and Johnson, K.S., 1994. The effect of time between sessions on within-session patterns of responding. Behav. Process., 31: 207–218.
– reference: McSweeney, F.K., Hinson, J.M. and Cannon, C.B., 1996a. Sensitization–habituation occurs during operant conditioning procedures. Psych. Bull., 120: 256–271.
– reference: Melville, C.L. and Weatherly, J.N., 1996. Within-session patterns of responding when rats run in a T-maze. Behav. Process., 38: 89–102.
– reference: . Behav. Neurosci., 108: 1019–1029.
– reference: McSweeney, F.K., Roll, J.M. and Weatherly, J.N., 1994. Within–session changes in responding during several simple schedules. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 62: 109–132.
– reference: Davis, M., 1970. Effects of interstimulus interval length and variability on startle-response habituation in the rat. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 72: 177–192.
– reference: McSweeney, F.K. and Hinson, J.M., 1992. Patterns of responding within sessions. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 58: 19–36.
– reference: Fleshler, M. and Hoffman, H.S., 1962. A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 5: 529–530.
– reference: McSweeney, F.K., 1992. Rate of reinforcement and session duration as determinants for within-session patterns of responding. Anim. Learn. Behav., 20: 160–169.
– reference: Graham, F.K., 1973. Habituation and dishabituation of responses innervated by the autonomic nervous system. In: H.V.S. Peeke and M.J. Herz (Editors), Habituation. Vol. 1: Behavioral Studies, Academic Press, New York, pp. 163–218.
– reference: McSweeney, F.K., Weatherly, J.N. and Swindell, S., 1996b. Within-session changes in responding during variable interval schedules. Behav. Process., 36: 67–76.
– reference: Roll, J.M., McSweeney, F.K., Johnson, K.S. and Weatherly, J.N., 1995. Satiety contributes little to within-session decreases in responding. Learn. Motiv., 26: 323–341.
– reference: Broster, B.S. and Rankin, C.H., 1994. Effects of changing interstimulus interval during habituation in
– reference: Cannon, C.B. and McSweeney, F.K., 1996. Within-session changes in responding when rate and duration of reinforcement vary. Behav. Process., 34: 285–292.
– reference: McSweeney, F.K., Hatfield, J. and Allen, T.M., 1990. Within-session responding as a function of post-session feedings. Behav. Process., 22: 177–186.
– reference: McSweeney, F.K. and Roll, J.M., 1993. Responding changes systematically within sessions during conditioning procedures. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 60: 621–640.
– reference: Weatherly, J.N., McSweeney, F.K. and Swindell, S., 1995. On the contributions of responding and reinforcement to within-session patterns of responding. Learn. Motiv., 26: 421–432.
– reference: Killeen, P.R., 1995. Economics, ecologics, and mechanics: the dynamics of responding under conditions of varying motivation. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 64: 405–431.
– ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB1
  doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.108.6.1019
– ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB4
  doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-529
– ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB14
  doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(95)00016-X
– ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB7
  doi: 10.3758/BF03200413
– ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB6
  doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.64-405
– ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB17
  doi: 10.1016/S0023-9690(05)80005-0
– ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB2
  doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(95)00009-J
– ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB5
  doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-549801-2.50011-4
– ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB15
  doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(96)00024-1
– ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB10
  doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.120.2.256
– ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB16
  doi: 10.1016/0023-9690(95)90018-7
– ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB11
  doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(94)90007-8
– ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB12
  doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-621
– ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB8
  doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(91)90092-E
– ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB13
  doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.62-109
– ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB9
  doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-19
– ident: 10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0_BIB3
  doi: 10.1037/h0029472
SSID ssj0001806
Score 1.4848294
Snippet The present study was an attempt to determine the factors to which subjects sensitize and/or habituate within experimental sessions. Rats pressed a lever and...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 279
SubjectTerms Habituation
Interval schedule
Pigeon
Rat
Reinforcement probability
Sensitization
Title Within-session patterns of responding with changes in the variability and probability of food delivery
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00759-0
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24897335
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1534096711
https://www.proquest.com/docview/15953644
Volume 39
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEBbphkIvpekrm7ZbFXpoD8ra0cP2MSwJ21cobUNDL0K2RtQQ7CW7CeTS394Zy96QwxLI0cIjhtFoHtLoG8beYxBRBlM5EdKkFCpkTpSpLAUtuJGhzH0HpP3txMxP1eczfbbFZsNbGCqr7G1_tOmdte5Hpr00p4u6nv5McG8QmlpBEOu6wLx9-0AWRo_Y9uGnL_OTtUFO8yReWWZGEMHNQ544STf4oTAfu3lEsslFbQpBO1d0_IQ97mNIfhjZ3GFb0DxlD_-03Qn5MxZ-16u_dSOWEXKDLzoIzWbJ28AvupJY8lecTmB5fPe75HXDMRLkV5g5R-Dua-4az6ndzPCN1KFtPfdwTrUc18_Z6fHRr9lc9O0URCULtRKhQtlnxpnMZUAw9pDL4MHgHlYpVA5y4wiMJ8-l15g36jIAlBrAKW8gUfIFGzVtA7uMK-VA--BkBZkizLK0BO0qj8GlCqDNmKlBgrbqscap5cW5vSkqQ8FbErwtqLAOBW-TMdtfky0i2MZdBPmwPPaW1lh0CHeRvhuW0-KOomsS10B7ubToAzDpNVmajtnbjf_QtbdSY_YyasKa3wOVF5mUeu_-rL1ijyJILhXNvGaj1cUlvMHQZ1VO2IP9f-kEFXz24-v3Sa_o_wEukv_u
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEB7ChtJeSt_dvqJCD-1BXbt62D6G0LBpkr00oaEXIVkjYgj2kt0U8u-rsewNPSyBHi08QsxoXprRJ4BPMYhwQdeWhzxzXIbCcpcLx0ngWgRX-h5I-3Sh5-fyx4W62IGD8S4MtVUOtj_Z9N5aDyOzgZuzZdPMfmZRNwhNrSKIdVXFvH1XqpjtTWB3_-h4vtgY5LzMUsmy0JwI7i7ypEn6wc-V_tLPw7NtLmpbCNq7osMn8HiIIdl-WuZT2MH2GTz43fUn5M8h_GrWl03LVwlygy17CM12xbrArvuWWPJXjE5gWbr3u2JNy2IkyP7EzDkBd98y23pGz82M35E6dJ1nHq-ol-P2BZwffj87mPPhOQVei0queagj7wttdWELJBh7LEXwqKMOyxxri6W2BMZTlsKrmDcqFxCdQrTSa8ykeAmTtmvxNTApLSofrKixkIRZljtUtvYxuJQBlZ6CHDlo6gFrnJ68uDJ3TWWR8YYYbypqrIuMN9kUvm7Ilgls4z6CchSP-WfXmOgQ7iP9OIrTRI2iMoltsbtZmegDYtKrizyfwt7Wf6jsLeUUXqWdsFnvN1lWhRDqzf8vbQ8ezs9OT8zJ0eL4LTxKgLnUQPMOJuvrG3wfw6C1-zBs879NWABX
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Within-session+patterns+of+responding+with+changes+in+the+variability+and+probability+of+food+delivery&rft.jtitle=Behavioural+processes&rft.au=Weatherly%2C+J+N&rft.au=McSweeney%2C+F+K&rft.au=Swindell%2C+S&rft.date=1997-02-01&rft.issn=0376-6357&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=289&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2FS0376-6357%2896%2900759-0&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0376-6357&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0376-6357&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0376-6357&client=summon