Examining the effects of interprofessional problem-based clinical ethics: Findings from a mixed methods study

• Published in: Journal of interprofessional care Vol. 30; no. 3; pp. 362 - 369
• Main Authors: Chou, Fremen Chihchen, Kwan, Chiu-Yin, Hsin, Dena Hsin-Chen
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Taylor & Francis 03.05.2016; Taylor & Francis Ltd
• Subjects: Attitude of Health Personnel; Caregiving; Clinical ethics; Content analysis; Cooperative Behavior; Ethical dilemmas; Ethics; Ethics, Clinical - education; Female; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Homework; Humans; Interdisciplinary aspects; Interdisciplinary education; Interprofessional education; Interprofessional Relations; Learning; Male; Medical students; mixed methods; Nursing; Problem based learning; Problem-Based Learning - methods; Professional identity; professional socialisation; Students; Students, Medical - psychology; Students, Nursing - psychology; Undergraduate students; interprofessional education; problem-based learning; Clinical ethics; content analysis; mixed methods; professional socialisation
• ISSN: 1356-1820; 1469-9567
• DOI: 10.3109/13561820.2016.1146877

Understanding how interprofessional education (IPE) works in learning clinical ethics via problem-based learning (PBL) and how different professions' perspectives influence each other in this setting may inform future IPE. Eighty-nine students participated in a clinical ethics PBL and were assigned into three study groups, i.e., medical, nursing, and interprofessional groups. This study applied an explanatory sequential mixed methods design. The quantitative phase involved observation of the learning process in PBL tutorial with checklists to code students' performance of learning behaviour, ethics discussion skills, learning content explored, and analysis through comparison of accumulative percentage of the coded performance between groups. Content analysis of post-PBL homework self-reflections from interprofessional group was conducted as the following explanatory qualitative phase. Quantitative results indicated that nursing students performed favourably on course engagement, caring, and communication while medical students performed positively on issue identification and the life science aspect. Interprofessional group showed the strength of the both professions and performed best through the learning process. Content analysis revealed that students in the interprofessional group achieved interprofessional learning from recognizing the differences between to appreciating learning from each other and to sense the need of future collaboration. With early exposure to IPE, undergraduate students may learn to balance their socialized viewpoints by seeing ethical dilemmas from each other's standpoint.