Aprepitant in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving carboplatin-based chemotherapy

Abstract Objectives Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is an unanswered problem in cancer therapy. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of triple antiemetic therapy with aprepitant, a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT3 ) receptor antagonist, and dexamethasone in patients with advanced non-sma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Vol. 84; no. 3; pp. 259 - 264
Main Authors Ito, Yasuhiro, Karayama, Masato, Inui, Naoki, Kuroishi, Shigeki, Nakano, Hideki, Nakamura, Yutaro, Yokomura, Koshi, Toyoshima, Mikio, Shirai, Toshihiro, Masuda, Masafumi, Yamada, Takashi, Yasuda, Kazumasa, Hayakawa, Hiroshi, Suda, Takafumi, Chida, Kingo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier 01.06.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Objectives Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is an unanswered problem in cancer therapy. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of triple antiemetic therapy with aprepitant, a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT3 ) receptor antagonist, and dexamethasone in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received carboplatin-based first-line chemotherapy. Methods Chemotherapy-naïve patients with NSCLC were enrolled in this randomized phase-II study. Patients were randomized to standard antiemetic therapy with a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone, and aprepitant add-on triple antiemetic therapy. The primary endpoint was the complete response rate (no vomiting and no rescue therapy) during the 120 h post-chemotherapy. Results A total of 134 patients were assigned randomly to the aprepitant group or the control group. The aprepitant group and the control group showed an overall complete response rate of 80.3% (95% confidence interval (CI), 69.2–88.1%) and 67.2% (95% CI, 55.3–77.2%; odds ratio (OR), 0.50; 95% CI, 0.22–1.10; p = 0.085), respectively. Among patients taking carboplatin and pemetrexed, adding aprepitant significantly improved the complete response rate in the overall phase (83.8% in the aprepitant group and 56.8% in the control group; OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.08–0.70; p < 0.01) and the delayed phase (86.5% in the aprepitant group and 59.1% in the control group; OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.07–0.65; p < 0.01). Conclusion Carboplatin-based chemotherapy has considerable emetic potential. Triple antiemetic therapy with aprepitant, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, and dexamethasone improved the control of CINV prevention in patients receiving carboplatin and pemetrexed chemotherapy.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0169-5002
1872-8332
DOI:10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.03.017