The efficacy of virtual reality tools for total knee replacement rehabilitation: A systematic review

Purpose. To assess the effects of training with virtual reality tools (VRT) during rehabilitation of patients after total knee replacement (TKR). Methods. Systematic review. Six databases were queried. Search criteria included studies in which participants underwent TKR, took part in a rehabilitatio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhysiotherapy theory and practice Vol. 37; no. 6; pp. 682 - 692
Main Authors Blasco, José, Igual-Camacho, Celedonia, Blasco, Marí, Antón-Antón, Virgilia, Ortiz-Llueca, lvaro, Roig-Casasús, Sergio
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Taylor & Francis 03.06.2021
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose. To assess the effects of training with virtual reality tools (VRT) during rehabilitation of patients after total knee replacement (TKR). Methods. Systematic review. Six databases were queried. Search criteria included studies in which participants underwent TKR, took part in a rehabilitation protocol with VRT, and clinical outcomes of rehabilitation were considered. Available demographic, interventional and outcome data, along with functional, balance, and pain outcome measures were extracted. Patient satisfaction was also summarized. Results. Six trials were included. Available information shows that multi-modal intervention with VRT is used primarily to augment conventional rehabilitation. The Wii Balance Board is the most frequently used device. Conclusions. Findings suggest that an augmented VRT physical therapy intervention that is specifically-oriented to enhance balance could be more effective for overcoming balance limitations than standard physical therapy. However, rehabilitation with VRT has no advantage over conventional training for enhancing function, resolving pain, or increasing patient satisfaction after TKR. Future studies are needed to confirm the findings, particularly regarding the feasibility of preoperative and continued in-home intervention. Registration: CRD42017057087.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-3
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0959-3985
1532-5040
1532-5040
DOI:10.1080/09593985.2019.1641865