The comparison between two methods of membrane cleaning to control membrane fouling in a hybrid membrane photobioreactor (HMPBR)

In this study, the effect of two membrane cleaning methods, such as aeration and addition of granular particles in a hybrid membrane photobioreactor (HMPBR) including Spirulina sp. with the concentration of 1.5 g·L −1 was investigated. Three different spargers [i.e., different diameters of orifice (...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPreparative biochemistry & biotechnology Vol. 53; no. 4; pp. 394 - 400
Main Authors Keyvan Hosseini, Mahsa, Keyvan Hosseini, Parisa, Helchi, Salar, Pajoum Shariati, Farshid
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Taylor & Francis 2023
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In this study, the effect of two membrane cleaning methods, such as aeration and addition of granular particles in a hybrid membrane photobioreactor (HMPBR) including Spirulina sp. with the concentration of 1.5 g·L −1 was investigated. Three different spargers [i.e., different diameters of orifice (d o ): 0.5, 1, and 1.5 mm] and granular particles (i.e., three packing ratios of 0.5, 1, and 1.5%) were used. The results showed that with the increase in granular packing ratio, R c /R t decreased significantly. The best result was achieved by combining aeration with an orifice diameter of 1.5 mm and a granular packing ratio of 1.5%, which led to the lowest R c /R t value (0.38), while R c /R t value with a d o of 1.5 mm was 0.68 without particles. In contrast, the ratio of pore blocking resistance to total resistance (R p /R t ) increased by 4.2% under the combined application of 1.5 mm of orifice diameter and 1.5% of granular packing ratio. The results from protein concentrations in the cake layer showed that as the d o became larger, cake protein concentration decreased by 40%, whereas increasing the granular packing ratio from 0.5 to 1.5% increased protein concentration by 60% in the cake layer.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1082-6068
1532-2297
DOI:10.1080/10826068.2022.2095574