The comparison between two methods of membrane cleaning to control membrane fouling in a hybrid membrane photobioreactor (HMPBR)
In this study, the effect of two membrane cleaning methods, such as aeration and addition of granular particles in a hybrid membrane photobioreactor (HMPBR) including Spirulina sp. with the concentration of 1.5 g·L −1 was investigated. Three different spargers [i.e., different diameters of orifice (...
Saved in:
Published in | Preparative biochemistry & biotechnology Vol. 53; no. 4; pp. 394 - 400 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Taylor & Francis
2023
Taylor & Francis Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | In this study, the effect of two membrane cleaning methods, such as aeration and addition of granular particles in a hybrid membrane photobioreactor (HMPBR) including Spirulina sp. with the concentration of 1.5 g·L
−1
was investigated. Three different spargers [i.e., different diameters of orifice (d
o
): 0.5, 1, and 1.5 mm] and granular particles (i.e., three packing ratios of 0.5, 1, and 1.5%) were used. The results showed that with the increase in granular packing ratio, R
c
/R
t
decreased significantly. The best result was achieved by combining aeration with an orifice diameter of 1.5 mm and a granular packing ratio of 1.5%, which led to the lowest R
c
/R
t
value (0.38), while R
c
/R
t
value with a d
o
of 1.5 mm was 0.68 without particles. In contrast, the ratio of pore blocking resistance to total resistance (R
p
/R
t
) increased by 4.2% under the combined application of 1.5 mm of orifice diameter and 1.5% of granular packing ratio. The results from protein concentrations in the cake layer showed that as the d
o
became larger, cake protein concentration decreased by 40%, whereas increasing the granular packing ratio from 0.5 to 1.5% increased protein concentration by 60% in the cake layer. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1082-6068 1532-2297 |
DOI: | 10.1080/10826068.2022.2095574 |