Quantitative polymerase chain reaction using an external control mRNA for determination of gene expression in a heterogeneous cell population

Gene expression can be evaluated quantitatively by conventional RT-PCR or Northern blotting with the aid of a correction based on the expression of an internal control gene. However, this approach is not suitable for quantitating gene expression in a group of heterogeneous cell subsets, because the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inToxicological sciences Vol. 49; no. 2; pp. 290 - 296
Main Authors SHIBATA, M, HARIYA, T, HATAO, M, ASHIKAGA, T, ICHIKAWA, H
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cary, NC Oxford University Press 01.06.1999
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Gene expression can be evaluated quantitatively by conventional RT-PCR or Northern blotting with the aid of a correction based on the expression of an internal control gene. However, this approach is not suitable for quantitating gene expression in a group of heterogeneous cell subsets, because the internal control gene expression may vary among the subsets. Therefore, we developed a new method for quantitative PCR using rat poly(A)+ RNA as an external control. We used this method to investigate cytokine gene expression in lymph node cells from mice during the induction of contact hypersensitivity. Expression of the murine glyceraldehydephosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) gene, a candidate internal control, was not constant in cells from trinitrochlorobenzene- and vehicle-applied animals, suggesting that GAPDH gene expression changes in heterogeneous lymph node-cell subsets during induction of contact hypersensitivity. Therefore, we decided to use rat GAPDH mRNA as an external control. Cytokine gene expression was measured by quantitative PCR and was corrected based on external rat GAPDH cDNA. The reliability of this quantitative PCR was superior to that of the conventional method with an internal control.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:1096-6080
1096-0929
1096-0929
DOI:10.1093/toxsci/49.2.290