A systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of interprofessional mentoring in medicine from 2000 to 2019

• Published in: Journal of interprofessional care Vol. 35; no. 6; pp. 927 - 939
• Main Authors: Tay, Kuang Teck, Tan, Xiu Hui, Tan, Lorraine Hui En, Vythilingam, Divya, Chin, Annelissa Mien Chew, Loh, Victor, Toh, Ying Pin, Krishna, Lalit Kumar Radha
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Taylor & Francis 02.11.2021; Taylor & Francis Ltd
• Subjects: (MeSH): Mentoring; Accounts; Ethics; Information sharing; Interdisciplinary aspects; interprofessional Mentoring; interprofessional Relations; Literature reviews; medical Education; Medical malpractice; Mentoring; mosaic Mentoring; Palliative care; Scrutiny; Search strategies; Skill development; Teams; Trainees; interprofessional Mentoring; (MeSH): Mentoring; mosaic Mentoring; palliative care; medical Education; interprofessional Relations
• ISSN: 1356-1820; 1469-9567
• DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2020.1818700

Interprofessional mentoring in palliative care sees different members of the interprofessional team providing holistic, personalised andlongitudinal mentoring support, skills training and knowledge transfer as they mentor trainees at different points along their mentoring journeys. However, gaps in practice and their risk of potential mentoring malpractice even as interprofessional mentoring use continues to grow in palliative medicine underlines the need for careful scrutiny of its characteristics and constituents in order to enhance the design, evaluation and oversight of interprofessional mentoring programmes. Hence, a systematic scoping review on prevailing accounts of interprofessional mentoring in medicine is conducted to address this gap. Using Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) methodological framework for conducting scoping reviews and identical search strategies, 6 reviewers performed independent literature reviews of accounts of interprofessional mentoring published in 10 databases. Braun and Clarke's (2006) thematic analysis approach was adopted to evaluate across different mentoring settings. A total of 11111 abstracts were identified from 10 databases, 103 full-text articles reviewed and 14 full-text articles were thematically analysed to reveal 4 themes: characterizing, implementing, evaluating and obstacles to interprofessional mentoring. Interprofessional mentoring is founded upon a respectful and collaborative mentoring relationship that thrives despite inevitable differences in individual values, ethical perspectives at different career stages within diverse working environments. This warrants effective mentor-mentee trainings, alignment of expectations, roles and responsibilities, goals and timelines, and effective oversight of the programmes. Drawing upon the data provided, an interprofessional mentoring framework is forwarded to guide the design, evaluation and oversight of the programmes.