Effect of 2-Weeks Ischemic Preconditioning on Exercise Performance: A Pilot Study

An acute bout of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) has been reported to increase exercise performance. Nevertheless, the ineffectiveness of acute IPC on exercise performance has also been reported. Similarly, the effect of a shot-term intervention of IPC on exercise performance remains controversial in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in sports and active living Vol. 3; p. 646369
Main Authors Tanaka, Daichi, Suga, Tadashi, Shimoho, Kento, Isaka, Tadao
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media S.A 14.06.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:An acute bout of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) has been reported to increase exercise performance. Nevertheless, the ineffectiveness of acute IPC on exercise performance has also been reported. Similarly, the effect of a shot-term intervention of IPC on exercise performance remains controversial in previous studies. In this study, we examined the effects of short-term IPC intervention on whole and local exercise performances and its-related parameters. Ten healthy young males undertook a 2-weeks IPC intervention (6 days/weeks). The IPC applied to both legs with three episodes of a 5-min ischemia and 5-min reperfusion cycle. Whole-body exercise performance was assessed by peak O 2 consumption (VO 2 : VO 2 peak ) during a ramp-incremental cycling test. Local exercise performance was assessed by time to task failure during a knee extensor sustained endurance test. A repeated moderate-intensity cycling test was performed to evaluate dynamics of pulmonary VO 2 and muscle deoxygenation. The knee extensor maximal voluntary contraction and quadriceps femoris cross-sectional area measurements were performed to explore the potentiality for strength gain and muscle hypertrophy. The whole-body exercise performance (i.e., VO 2 peak ) did not change before and after the intervention ( P = 0.147, Power = 0.09, Effect size = 0.21, 95% confidence interval: −0.67, 1.09). Moreover, the local exercise performance (i.e., time to task failure) did not change before and after the intervention ( P = 0.923, Power = 0.05, Effect size = 0.02, 95% confidence interval: −0.86, 0.89). Furthermore, no such changes were observed for all parameters measured using a repeated moderate-intensity cycling test and knee extensor strength and quadriceps femoris size measurements. These findings suggest that a 2-weeks IPC intervention cannot increase whole-body and local exercise performances, corresponding with ineffectiveness on its-related parameters in healthy young adults. However, the statistical analyses of changes in the measured parameters in this study showed insufficient statistical power and sensitivity, due to the small sample size. Additionally, this study did not include control group(s) with placebo and/or nocebo. Therefore, further studies with a larger sample size and control group are required to clarify the present findings.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Bruno Moreira Silva, Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil; Moacir Marocolo, Juiz de Fora Federal University, Brazil
This article was submitted to Exercise Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
Edited by: François Billaut, Laval University, Canada
ISSN:2624-9367
2624-9367
DOI:10.3389/fspor.2021.646369