The Relationship of Self-Efficacy and Depression to Stuttering

This study investigated the relationship of self-efficacy for verbal fluency, academic self-efficacy, and depression between adolescents who stutter and fluent speakers. Two separate discriminant function analyses were performed. The first analysis used the self-efficacy and depression scores as res...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of speech-language pathology Vol. 12; no. 4; pp. 425 - 431
Main Authors Bray, Melissa A, Kehle, Thomas J, Lawless, Kimberly A, Theodore, Lea A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States ASHA 01.11.2003
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study investigated the relationship of self-efficacy for verbal fluency, academic self-efficacy, and depression between adolescents who stutter and fluent speakers. Two separate discriminant function analyses were performed. The first analysis used the self-efficacy and depression scores as response variables and fluency classification as the grouping variable. Results indicated that self-efficacy for speech was the sole significant variable and accounted for 61% of the variance in group status. A second simplified discriminant function analysis was performed using speech self-efficacy as the sole predictor of group membership. This single discriminant function correctly classified 81% of the overall sample into their known groups. Further, classification for participants who did not stutter (95.2%) was better than for those who did stutter (67%). Based on this and earlier research, adolescents appear to be capable of using self-efficacy scaling as a measure of confidence for verbal fluency, which may eventually prove to be useful in treatment.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:1058-0360
1558-9110
DOI:10.1044/1058-0360(2003/088)