Purified protein derivative reaction in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Indirect study of cellular immunity

• Published in: Lupus Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. 25 - 30
• Main Authors: Pascual-Ramos, V, Hernández-Cruz, B, Villalobos, I, Sifuentes-Osornio, J, Alcocer-Varela, J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Thousand Oaks, CA SAGE Publications 01.01.2002; Sage Publications Ltd
• Subjects: Adult; Female; Humans; Immunity, Cellular - immunology; Injections, Intradermal; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - immunology; Male; Middle Aged; Skin - immunology; Tuberculin - administration & dosage; Tuberculin - immunology; PPD; SLE; cellular immunity; anergy
• ISSN: 0961-2033; 1477-0962
• DOI: 10.1191/0961203302lu142oa

Cutaneous anergy in SLE patients results from disease activity and/or immunosuppressive treatment (IT). The aim of this study was to evaluate purified protein derivative (PPD) reaction in SLE patients. A total of 145 patients and 20 controls were studied. Five units of PPD were applied on day 0, and skin reaction was measured after 3 (PPD1) and 6 (PPD2) days. A booster was applied (day 14), and the reaction was measured after 3 (PPD3) and 6 (PPD4) days. Non-parametricANOVA test and unpaired Student's t-test were performed. Forty patients (group I) were inactive (MexSLEDAI 3), receiving no IT (at least 3 months previous to the PPD test); 39 (group II) were inactive receiving IT; 24 (group III) were active without IT, and 42 (group IV) were active with IT. Active patients had lower PPD1 (group III, 1.4 ± 0.9; group IV, 0.6 ± 0.5) than inactive patients (group I, 8.4 ± 2.3; group II, 5.1 ± 1.9) and than controls (9.4 ± 3; P ≤ 0.001). Group IV had lower delayed response (PPD2 = 0.3 ± 0.3) than inactive groups (group I, 2.6 ± 0.9; group II, 3.1 ± 0.8) and than controls (7.9 ± 2.5; P ≤ 0.001). Group III had lower delayed reaction P ≤ 0.001). Active SLE patients, receiving or not receiving IT, had lower skin response to PPD than inactive patients and controls.