Effectiveness and safety of isavuconazole prophylaxis for invasive fungal infections in the haematologic setting

Patients with haematologic malignancies are at high risk of developing invasive fungal infections (IFIs). Current guidelines recommend the use of azoles for IFI prophylaxis; however, in many clinical situations, antifungal prophylaxis is used off-label. We conducted a systematic literature review to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHematology (Luxembourg) Vol. 27; no. 1; pp. 723 - 732
Main Authors Ping, Yang, Hongmei, Jing, Bellmann, Christian, Inês, Mónica, Macmillan, Tom, Webb, Neil, Aram, Jalal A., Penack, Olaf
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Taylor & Francis 01.12.2022
Taylor & Francis Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Patients with haematologic malignancies are at high risk of developing invasive fungal infections (IFIs). Current guidelines recommend the use of azoles for IFI prophylaxis; however, in many clinical situations, antifungal prophylaxis is used off-label. We conducted a systematic literature review to provide haematologists with the available evidence on the effectiveness and safety of isavuconazole in IFI prophylaxis in interventional and real-world, observational studies. Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases, and relevant conference proceedings and clinical trial registries, were searched for studies on the effectiveness and safety of isavuconazole prophylaxis in adults at high risk of IFIs. Studies were assessed for inclusion and risk of bias. Nine studies were eligible for inclusion in the review, eight of which were in haematologic populations (patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation or with acute myeloid leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndromes; n = 5) or included haematologic populations (n = 3). Evidence from these studies suggests isavuconazole is effective for IFI prophylaxis in the haematologic setting. However, the studies frequently lacked safety data, most were based on small patient populations from single centres and risk of bias could not be assessed for five studies. These findings provide evidence for isavuconazole as an alternative azole for prophylaxis in high-risk populations. Limitations include lack of applicability of risk of bias assessment tools, level of filtering applied in the search strategy and focus on English-language publications. Isavuconazole may be an effective azole for IFI prophylaxis in high-risk haematologic populations, although further studies are needed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1607-8454
1607-8454
DOI:10.1080/16078454.2022.2076046