ENTRY REGULATIONS, WELFARE, AND DETERMINANTS OF MARKET STRUCTURE

Welfare effects of entry regulations are theoretically ambiguous in differentiated product markets. We use a dynamic oligopoly model of entry and exit with store-type differentiation and static price setting to evaluate how entry regulations affect long-run profitability, market structure, and welfa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational economic review (Philadelphia) Vol. 59; no. 2; pp. 727 - 756
Main Authors Maican, Florin G., Orth, Matilda
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Philadelphia Wiley Periodicals, Inc 01.05.2018
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0020-6598
1468-2354
DOI10.1111/iere.12286

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Welfare effects of entry regulations are theoretically ambiguous in differentiated product markets. We use a dynamic oligopoly model of entry and exit with store-type differentiation and static price setting to evaluate how entry regulations affect long-run profitability, market structure, and welfare. Based on unique data for all retail food stores in Sweden, we estimate demand, recover variable profits, and estimate entry costs and fixed costs by store type. Counterfactual policy experiments show that welfare increases when competition is enhanced by lower entry costs. Protecting small stores by imposing licensing fees on large stores is not welfare enhancing.
Bibliography:We would like to thank the editor and two anonymous referees for their excellent comments and suggestions. Furthermore, we thank John Asker, Emek Basker, Christoph Bauner, Gregory Crawford, Uli Doraszelski, Paul Grieco, Igal Hendel, Ariel Pakes, Amil Petrin, Mark Roberts, Philipp Schmidt‐Dengler, Junichi Suzuki, Yuya Takahashi, Otto Toivanen, Frank Verboven, and seminar participants at the Swedish National Conference on Economics, the 13th CEPR/JIE Conference on Applied IO, EEA‐ESEM, EARIE, and IIOC for their valuable comments. Special thanks to DELFI Marknadspartner, the Swedish Consumer Agency, Värderingsdata, and the Swedish National Organization of Pensioners (PRO) for providing the data. Financial support from the Swedish Retail and Wholesale Development Council, Torsten Söderbergs Stiftelse, and the Swedish Competition Authority is gratefully acknowledged.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0020-6598
1468-2354
DOI:10.1111/iere.12286